The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Processing complex aggregate queries over data streams
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed an increasing interest in designing algorithms for querying and analyzing streaming data (i.e., data that is seen only once in a fixed order) with only limited memory. Providing (perhaps approximate) answers to queries over such continuous data streams is a crucial requirement for many application environments; examples include large telecom and IP network installations where performance data from different parts of the network needs to be continuously collected and analyzed.In this paper, we consider the problem of approximately answering general aggregate SQL queries over continuous data streams with limited memory. Our method relies on randomizing techniques that compute small "sketch" summaries of the streams that can then be used to provide approximate answers to aggregate queries with provable guarantees on the approximation error. We also demonstrate how existing statistical information on the base data (e.g., histograms) can be used in the proposed framework to improve the quality of the approximation provided by our algorithms. The key idea is to intelligently partition the domain of the underlying attribute(s) and, thus, decompose the sketching problem in a way that provably tightens our guarantees. Results of our experimental study with real-life as well as synthetic data streams indicate that sketches provide significantly more accurate answers compared to histograms for aggregate queries. This is especially true when our domain partitioning methods are employed to further boast the accuracy of the final estimates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Classification And Regression Trees
Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (2017) · doi:10.1201/9781315139470 · Cited by 11,417
Cited by
An improved data stream summary: the count-min sketch and its applications
Cormode, G., & Muthukrishnan, S. (2005) · Journal of Algorithms · doi:10.1016/j.jalgor.2003.12.001 · Cited by 1,743
Gossip-based computation of aggregate information
Kempe, D., Dobra, A., & Gehrke, J. (2004) · 44th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2003. Proceedings. · doi:10.1109/sfcs.2003.1238221 · Cited by 1,480
Self-citationClock synchronization for wireless sensor networks: a survey
Sundararaman, B., Buy, U., & Kshemkalyani, A. D. (2005) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2005.01.002 · Cited by 988
Synopses for Massive Data: Samples, Histograms, Wavelets, Sketches
Cormode, G., Garofalakis, M., Haas, P. J., & Jermaine, C. (2011) · Foundations and Trends in Databases · doi:10.1561/1900000004 · Cited by 468
Self-citationProcessing Sliding Window Multi-Joins in Continuous Queries over Data Streams
Golab, L., & Tamer Özsu, M. (2003) · Proceedings 2003 VLDB Conference · doi:10.1016/b978-012722442-8/50051-3 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Dobra, A., Garofalakis, M., Gehrke, J., & Rastogi, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2002-06-03
- Pages
- 61-72
- ISSN
- 0730-8078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148706674
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.09
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Processing complex aggregate queries over data streams. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/564691.564699
- The paper
- Dobra, A., Garofalakis, M., Gehrke, J., & Rastogi, R. (2002). Processing complex aggregate queries over data streams. Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. https://doi.org/10.1145/564691.564699
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.