The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Conversion of control dependence to data dependence
Abstract
Program analysis methods, especially those which support automatic vectorization, are based on the concept of interstatement dependence where a dependence holds between two statements when one of the statements computes values needed by the other. Powerful program transformation systems that convert sequential programs to a form more suitable for vector or parallel machines have been developed using this concept [AllK 82, KKLW 80].The dependence analysis in these systems is based on data dependence. In the presence of complex control flow, data dependence is not sufficient to transform programs because of the introduction of control dependences. A control dependence exists between two statements when the execution of one statement can prevent the execution of the other. Control dependences do not fit conveniently into dependence-based program translators.One solution is to convert all control dependences to data dependences by eliminating goto statements and introducing logical variables to control the execution of statements in the program. In this scheme, action statements are converted to IF statements. The variables in the conditional expression of an IF statement can be viewed as inputs to the statement being controlled. The result is that control dependences between statements become explicit data dependences expressed through the definitions and uses of the controlling logical variables.This paper presents a method for systematically converting control dependences to data dependences in this fashion. The algorithms presented here have been implemented in PFC, an experimental vectorizer written at Rice University.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The program dependence graph and its use in optimization
Ferrante, J., Ottenstein, K. J., & Warren, J. D. (1987) · ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems · doi:10.1145/24039.24041 · Cited by 2,755
Self-citationAutomatic translation of FORTRAN programs to vector form
Allen, R., & Kennedy, K. (1987) · ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems · doi:10.1145/29873.29875 · Cited by 734
Self-citationThe program dependence graph in a software development environment
Ottenstein, K. J., & Ottenstein, L. M. (1984) · ACM SIGPLAN Notices · doi:10.1145/390011.808263 · Cited by 641
Brown, N. C., Campora, J. P., Granade, C., Heim, B., Wernli, S., Ryan-Anderson, C., Lucchetti, D., Paetznick, A., Roetteler, M., Svore, K., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.12106 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Allen, J. R., Kennedy, K., Porterfield, C., & Warren, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN symposium on Principles of programming languages - POPL '83
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1983
- Pages
- 177-189
- OpenAlex
- W2140311411
- Cited by
- 609
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.14
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conversion of control dependence to data dependence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/567067.567085
- The paper
- Allen, J. R., Kennedy, K., Porterfield, C., & Warren, J. (1983). Conversion of control dependence to data dependence. Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN symposium on Principles of programming languages - POPL '83. https://doi.org/10.1145/567067.567085
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.