Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 651

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dependence graphs and compiler optimizations

Open access
Kuck, D. J., Kuhn, R. H., Padua, D. A., Leasure, B., Wolfe, M.·1981·Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages - POPL '81

Abstract

Dependence graphs can be used as a vehicle for formulating and implementing compiler optimizations. This paper defines such graphs and discusses two kinds of transformations. The first are simple rewriting transformations that remove dependence arcs. The second are abstraction transformations that deal more globally with a dependence graph. These transformations have been implemented and applied to several different types of high-speed architectures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/567532.567555

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 651

Metadata

Authors
Kuck, D. J., Kuhn, R. H., Padua, D. A., Leasure, B., & Wolfe, M.
Venue
Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages - POPL '81
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
1981
Pages
207-218
OpenAlex
W2043555680
Cited by
651
References
0
FWCI
9.09
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dependence graphs and compiler optimizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/567532.567555
The paper
Kuck, D. J., Kuhn, R. H., Padua, D. A., Leasure, B., & Wolfe, M. (1981). Dependence graphs and compiler optimizations. Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages - POPL '81. https://doi.org/10.1145/567532.567555

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.