I/O-efficient techniques for computing pagerank
Abstract
Over the last few years, most major search engines have integrated link-based ranking techniques in order to provide more accurate search results. One widely known approach is the Pagerank technique, which forms the basis of the Google ranking scheme, and which assigns a global importance measure to each page based on the importance of other pages pointing to it. The main advantage of the Pagerank measure is that it is independent of the query posed by a user; this means that it can be precomputed and then used to optimize the layout of the inverted index structure accordingly. However, computing the Pagerank measure requires implementing an iterative process on a massive graph corresponding to billions of web pages and hyperlinks.In this paper, we study I/O-efficient techniques to perform this iterative computation. We derive two algorithms for Pagerank based on techniques proposed for out-of-core graph algorithms, and compare them to two existing algorithms proposed by Haveliwala. We also consider the implementation of a recently proposed topic-sensitive version of Pagerank. Our experimental results show that for very large data sets, significant improvements over previous results can be achieved on machines with moderate amounts of memory. On the other hand, at most minor improvements are possible on data sets that are only moderately larger than memory, which is the case in many practical scenarios.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Haveliwala, T. H. (2002) · Proceedings of the 11th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/511446.511513 · Cited by 1,567 · see citing works
Using PageRank to Characterize Web Structure
Pandurangan, G., Raghavan, P., & Upfal, E. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45655-4_36 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Efficient PageRank approximation via graph aggregation
Broder, A. Z., Lempel, R., Maghoul, F., & Pedersen, J. (2006) · Information Retrieval · doi:10.1007/s10791-006-7146-1 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chen, Y.-Y., Gan, Q., & Suel, T.
- Affiliations
- Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY
- Venue
- Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on Information and knowledge management
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2002-11-04
- Pages
- 549-557
- ISSN
- 2155-0751 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099092406
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Graph Theory and Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Algorithms and Data Compression
- Keywords
- PageRank, I/O-efficient algorithms, web graph, link-based ranking, search engine ranking, memory-constrained computation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review