Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,262

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Random number generators: good ones are hard to find

Open access
Park, S. K., Miller, K. W.·1988·Communications of the ACM

Abstract

Practical and theoretical issues are presented concerning the design, implementation, and use of a good, minimal standard random number generator that will port to virtually all systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/63039.63042

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,262

Metadata

Authors
Park, S. K., & Miller, K. W.
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
1988-10
Volume
31
Issue
10
Pages
1192-1201
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W2011398297
Cited by
1,262
References
0
FWCI
25.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Random number generators: good ones are hard to find. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/63039.63042
The paper
Park, S. K., & Miller, K. W. (1988). Random number generators: good ones are hard to find. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/63039.63042

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.