The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Properties and prediction of flow statistics from sampled packet streams
Abstract
Many routers can generate and export statistics on flows of packets that traverse them. Increasingly, high end routers form flow statistics from only a sampled packet stream in order to manage resource consumption involved.This paper addresses three questions. Firstly: what are the downstream consequences for the measurement infrastructure? Long traffic flows will be split up if the time between sampled packets exceeds the flow timeout. Using packet header traces we show that flows generated by increasingly prevalent peer-to-peer applicalions are vulnerable to this effect.Secondly: can the volume of packet-sampled flow statistics be easily determined? We develop a simple model that predicts both the export rate of flow packet-sampled flow statistics and the number of active flows. It uses unsampled flow statistics---those commonly currently collected--as its data, i.e., it does not rely on having packet header traces available.Thirdly: what properties of the original traffic stream can be inferred from the packet sampled flow statistics? We show that as well as estimating total bytes and packets, one can also infer more detail, specifically the number and average length of flows in the unsampled traffic stream, even though some flows will have no packets sampled. We believe that this information is useful, both for understanding source traffic, e.g. the dependence of flow lengths on application type, and also monitoring changes in the composition of the traffic, e.g., a flood of short flows during a DoS attack. In all cases, we evaluate our approach using packet header traces gathered in backbone and campus networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Estan, C., Keys, K., Moore, D., & Varghese, G. (2004) · Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications · doi:10.1145/1015467.1015495 · Cited by 351
Identifying and discriminating between web and peer-to-peer traffic in the network core
Erman, J., Mahanti, A., Arlitt, M., & Williamson, C. (2007) · Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/1242572.1242692 · Cited by 213
Metadata
- Authors
- Duffield, N., Lund, C., & Thorup, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the second ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Internet measurment - IMW '02
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 2002
- Pages
- 159
- OpenAlex
- W1974918169
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Properties and prediction of flow statistics from sampled packet streams. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/637201.637225
- The paper
- Duffield, N., Lund, C., & Thorup, M. (2002). Properties and prediction of flow statistics from sampled packet streams. Proceedings of the second ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Internet measurment - IMW '02. https://doi.org/10.1145/637201.637225
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.