The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Paper or interactive?: a study of prototyping techniques for ubiquitous computing environments
Abstract
We studied the effects of varying the fidelity and automation levels of a Ubicomp application prototype. Our results show that the interactive prototype captured the same usability issues that the paper prototype studies did and more. We found that paper prototyping is insufficient for supporting unique Ubicomp requirements, such as scalability, but a prototype with higher fidelity and automation levels can enhance the quality of interaction data available for evaluation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several researchers report that some usability issues can not be discovered unless the prototype provides a broad functional scope with a high degree of refinement, in particular for visual appearance and interactive behaviour (Liu and Khooshabeh 2003;McCurdy et al. 2006).”
From An empirically based model of software prototyping: a mapping study and a multi-case study (2023) · cites this paper as Liu and Khooshabeh 2003
In the citing paper
“A prototype can be constructed using a range of techniques and media, including sketching on paper (Hendry et al. 2005) or in PowerPoint, using a prototyping tool to produce a wireframe or a mock-up (Liu and Khooshabeh 2003), or using an early version of product software as your prototype (McCurdy et al. 2006;Sefelin et al. 2003).”
From An empirically based model of software prototyping: a mapping study and a multi-case study (2023) · cites this paper as Liu and Khooshabeh 2003
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, we note that studies report contradicting results on the relationship between prototype scope and the feedback that can be obtained, and thus the purpose that can be fulfilled.”
From An empirically based model of software prototyping: a mapping study and a multi-case study (2023) · cites this paper as Liu and Khooshabeh 2003
Citations
Cites
A survey of user-centered design practice
Vredenburg, K., Mao, J.-Y., Smith, P. W., & Carey, T. (2002) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/503376.503460 · Cited by 691 · cited 1×
“Although prototyping has been used with great success in obtaining usability data during the design of traditional UIs [2,3], its use in Ubicomp has not been thoroughly investigated.”
Rettig, M. (1994) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/175276.175288 · Cited by 440
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exiting the Cleanroom: On Ecological Validity and Ubiquitous Computing
Carter, S., Mankoff, J., Klemmer, S. R., & Matthews, T. (2008) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370020701851086 · Cited by 107
An empirically based model of software prototyping: a mapping study and a multi-case study
Bjarnason, E., Lang, F., & Mjöberg, A. (2023) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-023-10331-w · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, L., & Khooshabeh, P.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- ORCID
- Khooshabeh, Peter
- Venue
- CHI '03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '03
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 2003
- Pages
- 1030
- OpenAlex
- W2026809014
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- paper prototyping, interactive prototyping, ubiquitous computing, prototype fidelity, levels of automation, usability evaluation, scalability, interaction data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
