The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Implementation experience with MANET routing protocols
Abstract
This paper outlines our experience with the implementation and deployment of two MANET routing protocols on a five node, four hop, network. The work was prompted by the lack of published results concerning the issues associated with the implementation of MANET routing protocols on actual wireless networks, as opposed to results of simulation experiments. We examined implementations of two distance vector MANET routing protocols and found a number of problems with both protocols during the course of our experiments. The most significant was that neither protocol could provide a stable route over any multi-hop network connection. The route discovery process of both protocols is fooled by the transient availability of network links to nodes that were more than one hop away. Packets transmitted over a fading channel cause the routing protocol to conclude incorrectly that there is a new one hop neighbor that could provide a lower metric (hop count) route to even more distant nodes. This can occur even when nodes are stationary, mobility resulted in even less route stability. We implemented a simple signal strength based neighbor selection procedure to test our assertion that fading channels and unreliable network links were the cause of the failure of the routing protocols. The result was that neighbor discovery and the filtering for neighbors with which nodes could communicate reliably enables the creation of reliable multihop routes. Based on our experiences, we outline several recommendations for future work in MANET research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Computer for the 21st Century
Weiser, M. (1991) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0991-94 · Cited by 10,017
Cited by
A high-throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing
De Couto, D. S. J., Aguayo, D., Bicket, J., & Morris, R. (2003) · Proceedings of the 9th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking · doi:10.1145/938985.939000 · Cited by 3,356
Kramer, G., Marić, I., & Yates, R. D. (2006) · Foundations and Trends® in Networking · doi:10.1561/1300000004 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Chin, K.-W., Judge, J., Williams, A., & Kermode, R.
- Venue
- ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 49-59
- ISSN
- 0146-4833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122601757
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implementation experience with MANET routing protocols. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/774749.774758
- The paper
- Chin, K.-W., Judge, J., Williams, A., & Kermode, R. (2002). Implementation experience with MANET routing protocols. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. https://doi.org/10.1145/774749.774758
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.