The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ESRT: event-to-sink reliable transport in wireless sensor networks
Abstract
Wireless sensor networks (WSN) are event based systems that rely on the collective effort of several microsensor nodes. Reliable event detection at the sink is based on collective information provided by source nodes and not on any individual report. Hence, conventional end-to-end reliability definitions and solutions are inapplicable in the WSN regime and would only lead to a waste of scarce sensor resources. However, the absence of reliable transport altogether can seriously impair event detection. Hence, the WSN paradigm necessitates a collective phevent-to-sink reliability notion rather than the traditional end-to-end notion. To the best of our knowledge, reliable transport in WSN has not been studied from this perspective before.In order to address this need, a new reliable transport scheme for WSN, the event-to-sink reliable transport (ESRT) protocol, is presented in this paper. ESRT is a novel transport solution developed to achieve reliable event detection in WSN with minimum energy expenditure. It includes a congestion control component that serves the dual purpose of achieving reliability and conserving energy. Importantly, the algorithms of ESRT mainly run on the sink, with minimal functionality required at resource constrained sensor nodes. ESRT protocol operation is determined by the current network state based on the reliability achieved and congestion condition in the network. If the event-to-sink reliability is lower than required, ESRT adjusts the reporting frequency of source nodes aggressively in order to reach the target reliability level as soon as possible. If the reliability is higher than required, then ESRT reduces the reporting frequency conservatively in order to conserve energy while still maintaining reliability. This self-configuring nature of ESRT makes it robust to random, dynamic topology in WSN. Analytical performance evaluation and simulation results show that ESRT converges to the desired reliability with minimum energy expenditure, starting from any initial network state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wireless sensor networks for healthcare: A survey
Alemdar, H., & Ersoy, C. (2010) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.003 · Cited by 1,427
CODA: congestion detection and avoidance in sensor networks
Wan, C.-Y., Eisenman, S. B., & Campbell, A. T. (2003) · Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems · doi:10.1145/958491.958523 · Cited by 895
A survey of transport protocols for wireless sensor networks
Wang, C., Sohraby, K., Li, B., Daneshmand, M., & Hu, Y. (2006) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.2006.1637930 · Cited by 359
Reliability in wireless sensor networks: A survey and challenges ahead
Mahmood, M. A., Seah, W. K. G., & Welch, I. (2015) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2014.12.016 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Akan, Ö. B., & Akyildiz, I. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 4th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2003-06
- Pages
- 177-188
- OpenAlex
- W2108174427
- Cited by
- 738
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.94
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ESRT: event-to-sink reliable transport in wireless sensor networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/778415.778437
- The paper
- Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Akan, Ö. B., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2003). ESRT: event-to-sink reliable transport in wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of the 4th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing. https://doi.org/10.1145/778415.778437
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.