The DOI matches its Crossref record.
SELECT---a formal system for testing and debugging programs by symbolic execution
Abstract
SELECT is an experimental system for assisting in the formal systematic debugging of programs. It is intended to be a compromise between an automated program proving system and the current ad hoc debugging practice, and is similar to a system being developed by King et al. of IBM. SELECT systematically handles the paths of programs written in a LISP subset that includes arrays. For each execution path SELECT returns simplified conditions on input variables that cause the path to be executed, and simplified symbolic values for program variables at the path output. For conditions which form a system of linear equalities and inequalities SELECT will return input variable values that can serve as sample test data. The user can insert constraint conditions, at any point in the program including the output, in the form of symbolically executable assertions. These conditions can induce the system to select test data in user-specified regions. SELECT can also determine if the path is correct with respect to an output assertion. We present four examples demonstrating the various modes of system operation and their effectiveness in finding bugs. In some examples, SELECT was successful in automatically finding useful test data. In others, user interaction was required in the form of output assertions. SELECT appears to be a useful tool for rapidly revealing program errors, but for the future there is a need to expand its expressive and deductive power.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hints on Test Data Selection: Help for the Practicing Programmer
DeMillo, R. A., Lipton, R. J., & Sayward, F. G. (1978) · Computer · doi:10.1109/c-m.1978.218136 · Cited by 2,081
Search‐based software test data generation: a survey
McMinn, P. (2004) · Software Testing, Verification and Reliability · doi:10.1002/stvr.294 · Cited by 1,368
Selecting Software Test Data Using Data Flow Information
Rapps, S., & Weyuker, E. J. (1985) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.1985.232226 · Cited by 1,075
A survey of symbolic execution techniques
Baldoni, R., Coppa, E., D’elia, D. C., Demetrescu, C., & Finocchi, I. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3182657 · Cited by 708
Boehm (1976) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/tc.1976.1674590 · Cited by 544
Metadata
- Authors
- Boyer, R. S., Elspas, B., & Levitt, K. N.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the international conference on Reliable software -
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1975
- Pages
- 234-245
- OpenAlex
- W2611698539
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.69
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SELECT---a formal system for testing and debugging programs by symbolic execution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/800027.808445
- The paper
- Boyer, R. S., Elspas, B., & Levitt, K. N. (1975). SELECT---a formal system for testing and debugging programs by symbolic execution. Proceedings of the international conference on Reliable software -. https://doi.org/10.1145/800027.808445
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.