Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 435

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Node-and edge-deletion NP-complete problems

Open access
Yannakakis, Mihalis·1978·Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '78

Abstract

If π is a graph property, the general node(edge) deletion problem can be stated as follows: Find the minimum number of nodes(edges), whose deletion results in a subgraph satisfying property π. In this paper we show that if π belongs to a rather broad class of properties (the class of properties that are hereditary on induced subgraphs) then the node-deletion problem is NP-complete, and the same is true for several restrictions of it. For the same class of properties, requiring the remaining graph to be connected does not change the NP-complete status of the problem; moreover for a certain subclass, finding any "reasonable" approximation is also NP-complete. Edge-deletion problems seem to be less amenable to such generalizations. We show however that for several common properties (e.g. planar, outer-planar, line-graph, transitive digraph) the edge-deletion problem is NP-complete.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/800133.804355

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 435

Metadata

Authors
Yannakakis, M.
Venue
Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '78
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
1978
Pages
253-264
OpenAlex
W2045027193
Cited by
435
References
1
FWCI
2.33
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Node-and edge-deletion NP-complete problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/800133.804355
The paper
Yannakakis, M. (1978). Node-and edge-deletion NP-complete problems. Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '78. https://doi.org/10.1145/800133.804355

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.