Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 971

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Gprof: A call graph execution profiler

Graham, Susan L., Kessler, Peter B., Mckusick, Marshall K.·1982·Proceedings of the 1982 SIGPLAN symposium on Compiler construction - SIGPLAN '82

Abstract

Large complex programs are composed of many small routines that implement abstractions for the routines that call them. To be useful, an execution profiler must attribute execution time in a way that is significant for the logical structure of a program as well as for its textual decomposition. This data must then be displayed to the user in a convenient and informative way. The gprof profiler accounts for the running time of called routines in the running time of the routines that call them. The design and use of this profiler is described.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/800230.806987

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 971

Metadata

Authors
Graham, S. L., Kessler, P. B., & Mckusick, M. K.
Venue
Proceedings of the 1982 SIGPLAN symposium on Compiler construction - SIGPLAN '82
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
1982
Pages
120-126
OpenAlex
W2144433126
Cited by
971
References
0
FWCI
1.07
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gprof: A call graph execution profiler. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/800230.806987
The paper
Graham, S. L., Kessler, P. B., & Mckusick, M. K. (1982). Gprof: A call graph execution profiler. Proceedings of the 1982 SIGPLAN symposium on Compiler construction - SIGPLAN '82. https://doi.org/10.1145/800230.806987

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.