The DOI matches its Crossref record.
SEQUEL: A structured English query language
Abstract
In this paper we present the data manipulation facility for a structured English query language (SEQUEL) which can be used for accessing data in an integrated relational data base. Without resorting to the concepts of bound variables and quantifiers SEQUEL identifies a set of simple operations on tabular structures, which can be shown to be of equivalent power to the first order predicate calculus. A SEQUEL user is presented with a consistent set of keyword English templates which reflect how people use tables to obtain information. Moreover, the SEQUEL user is able to compose these basic templates in a structured manner in order to form more complex queries. SEQUEL is intended as a data base sublanguage for both the professional programmer and the more infrequent data base user.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The entity-relationship model—toward a unified view of data
Chen, P. P.-S. (1976) · ACM Transactions on Database Systems · doi:10.1145/320434.320440 · Cited by 4,708
Analysis and optimization based on reusable knowledge base of process performance models
Brodsky, A., Shao, G., Krishnamoorthy, M., Narayanan, A., Menascé, D., & Ak, R. (2017) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-016-8761-7 · Cited by 23
An RDBMS-only architecture for web applications
Vicente, A., Etcheverry, L., & Sabiguero, A. (2021) · 2021 XLVII Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI) · doi:10.1109/clei53233.2021.9640017 · Cited by 4
Digital Transformation: Reshaping Access and Engagement
Meesad, P., & Mingkhwan, A. (2024) · Studies in Big Data · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-69216-1_4 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Chamberlin, D. D., & Boyce, R. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 1976 ACM SIGFIDET (now SIGMOD) workshop on Data description, access and control - FIDET '76
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1976
- Pages
- 249-264
- OpenAlex
- W2012056301
- Cited by
- 584
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.19
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
