The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Resource overbooking and application profiling in shared hosting platforms
Abstract
In this paper, we present techniques for provisioning CPU and network resources in shared hosting platforms running potentially antagonistic third-party applications. The primary contribution of our work is to demonstrate the feasibility and benefits of overbooking resources in shared platforms, to maximize the platform yield: the revenue generated by the available resources. We do this by first deriving an accurate estimate of application resource needs by profiling applications on dedicated nodes, and then using these profiles to guide the placement of application components onto shared nodes. By overbooking cluster resources in a controlled fashion, our platform can provide performance guarantees to applications even when overbooked, and combine these techniques with commonly used QoS resource allocation mechanisms to provide application isolation and performance guarantees at run-time. When compared to provisioning based on the worst-case, the efficiency (and consequently revenue) benefits from controlled overbooking of resources can be dramatic. Specifically, experiments on our Linux cluster implementation indicate that overbooking resources by as little as 1% can increase the utilization of the cluster by a factor of two, and a 5% overbooking yields a 300--500% improvement, while still providing useful resource guarantees to applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yield management at American airlines
Smith, B. C., Leimkuhler, J. F., & Darrow, R. M. (1992) · Interfaces · doi:10.1287/inte.22.1.8 · Cited by 697
Cited by
Ensemble-level Power Management for Dense Blade Servers
Ranganathan, P., Leech, P., Irwin, D., & Chase, J. (2006) · ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News · doi:10.1145/1150019.1136492 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Urgaonkar, B., Shenoy, P., & Roscoe, T.
- Venue
- ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review
- Published
- 2002-12-31
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- SI
- Pages
- 239-254
- ISSN
- 0163-5980 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049717788
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 55.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resource overbooking and application profiling in shared hosting platforms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/844128.844151
- The paper
- Urgaonkar, B., Shenoy, P., & Roscoe, T. (2002). Resource overbooking and application profiling in shared hosting platforms. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review. https://doi.org/10.1145/844128.844151
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.