The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A model for web services discovery with QoS
Abstract
Web services technology has generated a lot interest, but its adoption rate has been slow. This paper discusses issues related to this slow take up and argues that quality of services is one of the contributing factors. The paper proposes a new Web services discovery model in which the functional and non-functional requirements (i.e. quality of services) are taken into account for the service discovery. The proposed model should give Web services consumers some confidence about the quality of service of the discovered Web services.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Context Aware Computing for The Internet of Things: A Survey
Perera, C., Zaslavsky, A., Christen, P., & Georgakopoulos, D. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2013.042313.00197 · Cited by 2,861
A Security Evaluation Method Based on Threat Classification for Web Service
Jiang, L., Chen, H., Deng, F., & Zhong, Q. (2011) · Journal of Software · doi:10.4304/jsw.6.4.595-603 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Ran, S.
- Venue
- ACM SIGecom Exchanges
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 1551-9031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075106684
- Cited by
- 999
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 116.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A model for web services discovery with QoS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/844357.844360
- The paper
- Ran, S. (2003). A model for web services discovery with QoS. ACM SIGecom Exchanges. https://doi.org/10.1145/844357.844360
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
