The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New directions in traffic measurement and accounting: Focusing on the elephants, ignoring the mice
Abstract
Accurate network traffic measurement is required for accounting, bandwidth provisioning and detecting DoS attacks. These applications see the traffic as a collection of flows they need to measure. As link speeds and the number of flows increase, keeping a counter for each flow is too expensive (using SRAM) or slow (using DRAM). The current state-of-the-art methods (Cisco's sampled NetFlow), which count periodically sampled packets are slow, inaccurate and resource-intensive. Previous work showed that at different granularities a small number of "heavy hitters" accounts for a large share of traffic. Our paper introduces a paradigm shift by concentrating the measurement process on large flows only---those above some threshold such as 0.1% of the link capacity.We propose two novel and scalable algorithms for identifying the large flows: sample and hold and multistage filters , which take a constant number of memory references per packet and use a small amount of memory. If M is the available memory, we show analytically that the errors of our new algorithms are proportional to 1/ M ; by contrast, the error of an algorithm based on classical sampling is proportional to 1/√ M , thus providing much less accuracy for the same amount of memory. We also describe optimizations such as early removal and conservative update that further improve the accuracy of our algorithms, as measured on real traffic traces, by an order of magnitude. Our schemes allow a new form of accounting called threshold accounting in which only flows above a threshold are charged by usage while the rest are charged a fixed fee. Threshold accounting generalizes usage-based and duration based pricing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Data Streams: Algorithms and Applications
Muthukrishnan, S. (2005) · Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1561/0400000002 · Cited by 718
An Overview of IP Flow-Based Intrusion Detection
Sperotto, A., Schaffrath, G., Sadre, R., Morariu, C., Pras, A., & Stiller, B. (2010) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2010.032210.00054 · Cited by 466
On the Power of Multiple Anonymous Messages
Ghazi, B., Golowich, N., Kumar, R., Pagh, R., & Velingker, A. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.11358 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Estan, C., & Varghese, G.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Computer Systems
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 270-313
- ISSN
- 0734-2071 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7333
- OpenAlex
- W2012549717
- Cited by
- 539
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New directions in traffic measurement and accounting: Focusing on the elephants, ignoring the mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/859716.859719
- The paper
- Estan, C., & Varghese, G. (2003). New directions in traffic measurement and accounting: Focusing on the elephants, ignoring the mice. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/859716.859719
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.