The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimating flow distributions from sampled flow statistics
Open accessAbstract
Passive traffic measurement increasingly employs sampling at the packet level. Many high-end routers form flow statistics from a sampled substream of packets. Sampling is necessary in order to control the consumption of resources by the measurement operations. However, knowledge of the statistics of flows in the unsampled stream remains useful, for understanding both characteristics of source traffic, and consumption of resources in the network.This paper provide methods that use flow statistics formed from sampled packet stream to infer the absolute frequencies of lengths of flows in the unsampled stream. A key part of our work is inferring the numbers and lengths of flows of original traffic that evaded sampling altogether. We achieve this through statistical inference, and by exploiting protocol level detail reported in flow records. The method has applications to detection and characterization of network attacks: we show how to estimate, from sampled flow statistics, the number of compromised hosts that are sending attack traffic past the measurement point. We also investigate the impact on our results of different implementations of packet sampling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fadlullah, Z. M., Tang, F., Mao, B., Kato, N., Akashi, O., Inoue, T., & Mizutani, K. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2707140 · Cited by 810
Synopses for Massive Data: Samples, Histograms, Wavelets, Sketches
Cormode, G., Garofalakis, M., Haas, P. J., & Jermaine, C. (2011) · Foundations and Trends in Databases · doi:10.1561/1900000004 · Cited by 468
Structural analysis of network traffic flows
Lakhina, A., Papagiannaki, K., Crovella, M., Diot, C., Kolaczyk, E. D., & Taft, N. (2004) · Proceedings of the joint international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems · doi:10.1145/1005686.1005697 · Cited by 451
Estan, C., Keys, K., Moore, D., & Varghese, G. (2004) · Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications · doi:10.1145/1015467.1015495 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Duffield, N., Lund, C., & Thorup, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2003-08-25
- Pages
- 325-336
- OpenAlex
- W2127455097
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.73
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating flow distributions from sampled flow statistics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/863955.863992
- The paper
- Duffield, N., Lund, C., & Thorup, M. (2003). Estimating flow distributions from sampled flow statistics. Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications. https://doi.org/10.1145/863955.863992
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.