The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
LEAP: efficient security mechanisms for large-scale distributed sensor networks
Abstract
In this paper, we describe LEAP (Localized Encryption and Authentication Protocol), a key management protocol for sensor networks that is designed to support in-network processing, while at the same time restricting the security impact of a node compromise to the immediate network neighborhood of the compromised node. The design of the protocol is motivated by the observation that different types of messages exchanged between sensor nodes have different security requirements, and that a single keying mechanism is not suitable for meeting these different security requirements. LEAP supports the establishment of four types of keys for each sensor node -- an individual key shared with the base station, a pairwise key shared with another sensor node, a cluster key shared with multiple neighboring nodes, and a group key that is shared by all the nodes in the network. The protocol used for establishing and updating these keys is communication- and energy-efficient, and minimizes the involvement of the base station. LEAP also includes an efficient protocol for inter-node traffic authentication based on the use of one-way key chains. A salient feature of the authentication protocol is that it supports source authentication without precluding in-network processing and passive participation. We analyze the performance and the security of our scheme under various attack models and show our schemes are very efficient in defending against many attacks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Douceur, J. R. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45748-8_24 · Cited by 4,419
Password authentication with insecure communication
Lamport, L. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358790.358797 · Cited by 2,789
Cited by
Wireless Sensor Network Security: A Survey
Walters, J. P., Liang, Z., Shi, W., & Chaudhary, V. (2007) · Security in Distributed, Grid, Mobile, and Pervasive Computing · doi:10.1201/9780849379253-20 · Cited by 389
Combinatorial Design of Key Distribution Mechanisms for Wireless Sensor Networks
Camtepe, S. A., & Yener, B. (2007) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/tnet.2007.892879 · Cited by 365
A Survey on Wireless Sensor Network Security
Sen, J. (2010) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1011.1529 · Cited by 273
Applying intrusion detection systems to wireless sensor networks
Roman, R., Zhou, J., & Lopez, J. (2006) · CCNC 2006. 2006 3rd IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, 2006. · doi:10.1109/ccnc.2006.1593102 · Cited by 231
Pundir, S., Wazid, M., Singh, D. P., Das, A. K., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., & Park, Y. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2962829 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhu, S., Setia, S., & Jajodia, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on Computer and communications security
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2003-10-27
- Pages
- 62-72
- ISSN
- 1543-7221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048402311
- Cited by
- 1,117
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.25
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LEAP: efficient security mechanisms for large-scale distributed sensor networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/948109.948120
- The paper
- Zhu, S., Setia, S., & Jajodia, S. (2003). LEAP: efficient security mechanisms for large-scale distributed sensor networks. Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on Computer and communications security. https://doi.org/10.1145/948109.948120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.