Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 338

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Balancing confidentiality and efficiency in untrusted relational DBMSs

Damiani, Ernesto, Vimercati, S. De Capitani, Jajodia, Sushil, Paraboschi, Stefano, Samarati, Pierangela·2003·Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on Computer and communications security

Abstract

The scope and character of today's computing environments are progressively shifting from traditional, one-on-one client-server interaction to the new cooperative paradigm. It then becomes of primary importance to provide means of protecting the secrecy of the information, while guaranteeing its availability to legitimate clients. Operating on-line querying services securely on open networks is very difficult; therefore many enterprises outsource their data center operations to external application service providers. A promising direction towards prevention of unauthorized access to outsourced data is represented by encryption. However, data encryption is often supported for the sole purpose of protecting the data in storage and assumes trust in the server, that decrypts data for query execution.In this paper, we present a simple yet robust single-server solution for remote querying of encrypted databases on untrusted servers. Our approach is based on the use of indexing information attached to the encrypted database which can be used by the server to select the data to be returned in response to a query without the need of disclosing the database content. Our indexes balance the trade off between efficiency requirements in query execution and protection requirements due to possible inference attacks exploiting indexing information. We also investigate quantitative measures to model inference exposure and provide some related experimental results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/948109.948124

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 338

Metadata

Authors
Damiani, E., Vimercati, S. D. C., Jajodia, S., Paraboschi, S., & Samarati, P.
Venue
Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on Computer and communications security
Publisher
ACM
Published
2003-10-27
Pages
93-102
ISSN
1543-7221 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035871140
Cited by
338
References
0
FWCI
10.31
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Balancing confidentiality and efficiency in untrusted relational DBMSs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/948109.948124
The paper
Damiani, E., Vimercati, S. D. C., Jajodia, S., Paraboschi, S., & Samarati, P. (2003). Balancing confidentiality and efficiency in untrusted relational DBMSs. Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on Computer and communications security. https://doi.org/10.1145/948109.948124

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.