The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Balancing confidentiality and efficiency in untrusted relational DBMSs
Abstract
The scope and character of today's computing environments are progressively shifting from traditional, one-on-one client-server interaction to the new cooperative paradigm. It then becomes of primary importance to provide means of protecting the secrecy of the information, while guaranteeing its availability to legitimate clients. Operating on-line querying services securely on open networks is very difficult; therefore many enterprises outsource their data center operations to external application service providers. A promising direction towards prevention of unauthorized access to outsourced data is represented by encryption. However, data encryption is often supported for the sole purpose of protecting the data in storage and assumes trust in the server, that decrypts data for query execution.In this paper, we present a simple yet robust single-server solution for remote querying of encrypted databases on untrusted servers. Our approach is based on the use of indexing information attached to the encrypted database which can be used by the server to select the data to be returned in response to a query without the need of disclosing the database content. Our indexes balance the trade off between efficiency requirements in query execution and protection requirements due to possible inference attacks exploiting indexing information. We also investigate quantitative measures to model inference exposure and provide some related experimental results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Order preserving encryption for numeric data
Agrawal, R., Kiernan, J., Srikant, R., & Xu, Y. (2004) · Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/1007568.1007632 · Cited by 1,206
Deterministic and Efficiently Searchable Encryption
Bellare, M., Boldyreva, A., & O’Neill, A. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74143-5_30 · Cited by 745
The tao of inference in privacy-protected databases
Bindschaedler, V., Grubbs, P., Cash, D., Ristenpart, T., & Shmatikov, V. (2018) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3236187.3236217 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Damiani, E., Vimercati, S. D. C., Jajodia, S., Paraboschi, S., & Samarati, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on Computer and communications security
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2003-10-27
- Pages
- 93-102
- ISSN
- 1543-7221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035871140
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.31
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Balancing confidentiality and efficiency in untrusted relational DBMSs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/948109.948124
- The paper
- Damiani, E., Vimercati, S. D. C., Jajodia, S., Paraboschi, S., & Samarati, P. (2003). Balancing confidentiality and efficiency in untrusted relational DBMSs. Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on Computer and communications security. https://doi.org/10.1145/948109.948124
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.