The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Flowchart techniques for structured programming
Open accessAbstract
With the advent of structured programming and GOTO-less programming a method is needed to model computation in simply ordered structures, each representing a complete thought possibly defined in terms of other thoughts as yet undefined. A model is needed which prevents unrestricted transfers of control and has a control structure closer to languages amenable to structured programming. We present an attempt at such a model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: what are the differences and do they matter?
Davies, M. (2011) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9387-6 · Cited by 771
Boehm (1976) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/tc.1976.1674590 · Cited by 544
A Principled Taxonomy of Software Visualization
Price, B. A., Baecker, R. M., & Small, I. S. (1993) · Journal of Visual Languages & Computing · doi:10.1006/jvlc.1993.1015 · Cited by 476
Exploring the psychometric properties of the mind-map scoring rubric
Hua, C., & Wind, S. A. (2019) · Behaviormetrika · doi:10.1007/s41237-018-0062-z · Cited by 18
Supporting protocol-based care in medicine via multiple coordinated views
Aigner, W., & Miksch, S. (2004) · Proceedings. Second International Conference on Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization, 2004. · doi:10.1109/cmv.2004.1319532 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Nassi, I., & Shneiderman, B.
- Venue
- ACM SIGPLAN Notices
- Published
- 1973-08
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 12-26
- ISSN
- 0362-1340 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-1160
- OpenAlex
- W2043557231
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flowchart techniques for structured programming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/953349.953350
- The paper
- Nassi, I., & Shneiderman, B. (1973). Flowchart techniques for structured programming. ACM SIGPLAN Notices. https://doi.org/10.1145/953349.953350
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
