The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information-theoretic co-clustering
Abstract
Two-dimensional contingency or co-occurrence tables arise frequently in important applications such as text, web-log and market-basket data analysis. A basic problem in contingency table analysis is co-clustering: simultaneous clustering of the rows and columns. A novel theoretical formulation views the contingency table as an empirical joint probability distribution of two discrete random variables and poses the co-clustering problem as an optimization problem in information theory---the optimal co-clustering maximizes the mutual information between the clustered random variables subject to constraints on the number of row and column clusters. We present an innovative co-clustering algorithm that monotonically increases the preserved mutual information by intertwining both the row and column clusterings at all stages. Using the practical example of simultaneous word-document clustering, we demonstrate that our algorithm works well in practice, especially in the presence of sparsity and high-dimensionality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The information bottleneck method
Tishby, N., Pereira, F. C., & Bialek, W. (2000) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.physics/0004057 · Cited by 2,626 · cited 3×
“Our information-theoretic formulation of preserving mutual information is similar to the information bottleneck (IB) framework [20], which was introduced for one-sided clustering, say X to X̂.”
BackgroundMethod
Cited by
A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learning
Zhuang, F., Qi, Z., Duan, K., Xi, D., Zhu, Y., Zhu, H., Xiong, H., & He, Q. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2020.3004555 · Cited by 6,678
Biclustering algorithms for biological data analysis: a survey
Madeira, S. C., & Oliveira, A. L. (2004) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2004.2 · Cited by 2,049
Graph based anomaly detection and description: a survey
Akoglu, L., Tong, H., & Koutra, D. (2015) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-014-0365-y · Cited by 1,504
Hotho, A., Nürnberger, A., & Paaß, G. (2005) · Journal for Language Technology and Computational Linguistics · doi:10.21248/jlcl.20.2005.68 · Cited by 893
Solving cluster ensemble problems by bipartite graph partitioning
Fern, X. Z., & Brodley, C. E. (2004) · Twenty-first international conference on Machine learning - ICML '04 · doi:10.1145/1015330.1015414 · Cited by 559
Metadata
- Authors
- Dhillon, I. S., Mallela, S., & Modha, D. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2003-08-24
- Pages
- 89-98
- OpenAlex
- W2434205482
- Cited by
- 1,006
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.79
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information-theoretic co-clustering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/956750.956764
- The paper
- Dhillon, I. S., Mallela, S., & Modha, D. S. (2003). Information-theoretic co-clustering. Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/956750.956764
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.