Proceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on Document engineering
Abstract
The 2003 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering (DocEng 2003), is the third in a series of international conferences dedicated to research addressing the theory, design, development, and evaluation of computer systems that support the creation, analysis, distribution, and interaction with documents in any medium.Although the series began three years ago, it takes its roots from the tradition of several conferences, including the long series of biennial Electronic Publishing (EP) conferences and Principles of Document Processing workshops, the 2000 Digital Documents and Electronic Publishing conference, the 1988 ACM Conference on Documents Processing Systems, and the 1981 ACM Symposium on Text Manipulation.All those conferences contributed to the very notion of document, to be taken in the wide sense of printable and interactively "tangible" composite multimedia information. The DocEng symposium entered the third millennium encompassing a new vision of documents; they are currently at the heart of globally interconnected systems that store information drawn from many media and deliver that information as active documents that adapt to the needs of their users.Research in the area is going on both in academic institutions and industrial laboratories. As an ultimate consequence, document technologies like XML are having a profound impact on data modeling in general because of the way they bridge and integrate a variety of paradigms (database, knowledge representation, and structu…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mathematical content in PDFs remains largely unreadable by screen readers without proper semantic markup like MathML.
“Mathematical content in PDFs, whether rendered as images or through inaccessible LaTeX compilation, remains largely unreadable by screen readers without proper semantic markup like MathML [35, 42, 69].”
From "I Don't Trust Any Professional Research Tool": A Re-Imagination of Knowledge Production Workflows by, with, and for Blind and Low-Vision Researchers (2026) · cites this paper as [69]
Mathematical notation presents particularly acute accessibility challenges for BLV STEM researchers.
“Beyond general document formats, mathematical notation presents particularly acute accessibility challenges for BLV STEM researchers.”
From "I Don't Trust Any Professional Research Tool": A Re-Imagination of Knowledge Production Workflows by, with, and for Blind and Low-Vision Researchers (2026) · cites this paper as [69]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Khan, O., & Seo, J. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791242 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2003-11-20
- OpenAlex
- W4253683689
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2013: 1
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Applications and Data Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems and Technology Applications
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Digital Humanities and Scholarship
- Keywords
- document engineering, XML, active documents, document analysis, document conversion, multimedia documents, document editing software, document management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review