The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developing multiagent systems: The Gaia methodology
Open accessAbstract
Systems composed of interacting autonomous agents offer a promising software engineering approach for developing applications in complex domains. However, this multiagent system paradigm introduces a number of new abstractions and design/development issues when compared with more traditional approaches to software development. Accordingly, new analysis and design methodologies, as well as new tools, are needed to effectively engineer such systems. Against this background, the contribution of this article is twofold. First, we synthesize and clarify the key abstractions of agent-based computing as they pertain to agent-oriented software engineering. In particular, we argue that a multiagent system can naturally be viewed and architected as a computational organization , and we identify the appropriate organizational abstractions that are central to the analysis and design of such systems. Second, we detail and extend the Gaia methodology for the analysis and design of multiagent systems. Gaia exploits the aforementioned organizational abstractions to provide clear guidelines for the analysis and design of complex and open software systems. Two representative case studies are introduced to exemplify Gaia's concepts and to show its use and effectiveness in different types of multiagent system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intelligent agents: theory and practice
Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (1995) · The Knowledge Engineering Review · doi:10.1017/s0269888900008122 · Cited by 6,810
Self-citationThe vision of autonomic computing
Kephart, J. O., & Chess, D. M. (2003) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2003.1160055 · Cited by 6,572
Cited by
Artifacts in the A&A meta-model for multi-agent systems
Omicini, A., Ricci, A., & Viroli, M. (2008) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-008-9053-x · Cited by 347
Challenges and Research Directions in Agent-Oriented Software Engineering
Zambonelli, F., & Omicini, A. (2004) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1023/b:agnt.0000038028.66672.1e · Cited by 253
Self-citationMulti-Agent Systems Applications in Energy Optimization Problems: A State-of-the-Art Review
González-Briones, A., De La Prieta, F., Mohamad, M. S., Omatu, S., & Corchado, J. M. (2018) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en11081928 · Cited by 169
Security in Multi-Agent Systems
Hedin, Y., & Moradian, E. (2015) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.270 · Cited by 49
Inherent and emergent liability issues in LLM-based agentic systems: a principal-agent perspective
Gabison, G. A., & Xian, R. P. (2025) · Proceedings of the 1st Workshop for Research on Agent Language Models (REALM 2025) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.realm-1.9 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Zambonelli, F., Jennings, N. R., & Wooldridge, M.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 317-370
- ISSN
- 1049-331X (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7392
- OpenAlex
- W2129899354
- Cited by
- 1,275
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 97.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developing multiagent systems: The Gaia methodology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/958961.958963
- The paper
- Zambonelli, F., Jennings, N. R., & Wooldridge, M. (2003). Developing multiagent systems: The Gaia methodology. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1145/958961.958963
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.