The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Architectural considerations for a new generation of protocols
Abstract
The current generation of protocol architectures, such as TCP/IP or the ISO suite, seem successful at meeting the demands of todays networks. However, a number of new requirements have been proposed for the networks of tomorrow, and some innovation in protocol structuring may be necessary. In this paper, we review some key requirements for tomorrow's networks, and propose some architectural principles to structure a new generation of protocols. In particular, this paper identifies two new design principles, Application Level Framing and Integrated Layer Processing. Additionally, it identifies the presentation layer as a key aspect of overall protocol performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Online selection of discriminative tracking features
Collins, R. T., Liu, Y., & Leordeanu, M. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2005.205 · Cited by 1,208
Exokernel: an operating system architecture for application-level resource management
Engler, D. R., Kaashoek, M. F., & O'Toole, J. (1995) · Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles - SOSP '95 · doi:10.1145/224056.224076 · Cited by 1,118
Effective erasure codes for reliable computer communication protocols
Rizzo, L. (1997) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/263876.263881 · Cited by 916
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, D. D., & Tennenhouse, D. L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Communications architectures & protocols
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 1990-08
- Pages
- 200-208
- OpenAlex
- W2128883551
- Cited by
- 1,064
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.86
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
