Cited by 323Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Mass Spectrometry Applied to Bottom-Up Proteomics: Entering the High-Throughput Era for Hypothesis Testing

Gillet, Ludovic C., Leitner, Alexander, Aebersold, Ruedi·2016·Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

Proteins constitute a key class of molecular components that perform essential biochemical reactions in living cells. Whether the aim is to extensively characterize a given protein or to perform high-throughput qualitative and quantitative analysis of the proteome content of a sample, liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry has become the technology of choice. In this review, we summarize the current state of mass spectrometry applied to bottom-up proteomics, the approach that focuses on analyzing peptides obtained from proteolytic digestion of proteins. With the recent advances in instrumentation and methodology, we show that the field is moving away from providing qualitative identification of long lists of proteins to delivering highly consistent and accurate quantification values for large numbers of proteins across large numbers of samples. We believe that this shift will have a profound impact for the field of proteomics and life science research in general.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-anchem-071015-041535

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reduction in quantifiable proteins by LFQ LC-MS/MS is a consequence of the stochastic nature of data-dependent acquisition techniques that leads to the missing value problem.

    “This reduction in quantifiable proteins by LFQ LC-MS/MS is a consequence of the stochastic nature of data-dependent acquisition techniques that leads to the well-known “missing value” problem [7], where the same ions are not consistently chosen for MS/MS analysis across all runs, or the peptide precursor ions are not matched effectively across runs.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 94 · Cited by 323

Authors
Gillet, L. C., Leitner, A., & Aebersold, R.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Gillet, Ludovic C.
  • Leitner, Alexander
Venue
Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry
Published
2016-06-12
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
449-472
ISSN
  • 1936-1327 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-1335
OpenAlex
W2173312558
Cited by
323
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
shotgun proteomics, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, proteome quantification, high-throughput proteomics, peptide identification, proteolytic digestion, quantitative proteomics, hypothesis testing
MeSH terms
Peptides, Proteins, Mass Spectrometry, Proteomics, High-Throughput Screening Assays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review