The DOI matches its Crossref record; 131 of the 131 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental Politics of Reproduction
Open accessAbstract
What constitutes “human reproduction” is under negotiation as its biology, social nature, and cultural valences are increasingly perceived as bound up in environmental issues. This review maps the growing overlap between formerly rather separate domains of reproductive politics and environmental politics, examining three interrelated areas. The first is the emergence of an intersectional environmental reproductive justice framework in activism and environmental health science. The second is the biomedical delineation of the environment of reproduction and development as an object of growing research and intervention, as well as the marking off of early-life environments as an “exposed biology” consequential to the entire life span. Third is researchers’ critical engagement with the reproductive subject of environmental politics and the lived experience of reproduction in environmentally dystopic times. Efforts to rethink the intersections of reproductive and environmental politics are found throughout these three areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In addition, pregnancy trials, and the recent preconception trials that are modeled on pregnancy trials, reflect the expansion of reproductive surveillance and management across the life course and into future generation (Waggoner 2017; Lappé, Hein, and Landecker 2019; Pentecost and Meloni 2020).”
From The Politics of Postgenomic Reproduction: Exploring Pregnant Narratives from within a Clinical Trial (2022) · cites this paper as Lappé, Hein, and Landecker 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“feminist scholars have moved to position the language of choice to a much broader, intersectional framework of reproductive and environmental justice”
From #My(white)BodyMyChoice (2023) · cites this paper as Lappé et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 32,792
The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure
Larkin, B. (2013) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522 · Cited by 4,095
Developmental Effects of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals in Wildlife and Humans
Colborn, T., Saal, F. S. V., & Soto, A. M. (1993) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.93101378 · Cited by 3,570
Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin
Haraway, D. (2015) · Environmental Humanities · doi:10.1215/22011919-3615934 · Cited by 2,992
INFANT MORTALITY, CHILDHOOD NUTRITION, AND ISCHAEMIC HEART DISEASE IN ENGLAND AND WALES
BARKER, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91340-1 · Cited by 2,892
THE EMERGENCE OF MULTISPECIES ETHNOGRAPHY
Kirksey, E., & Helmreich, S. (2010) · Cultural Anthropology · doi:10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01069.x · Cited by 2,295
Life Exposed: Biological Citizens After Chernobyl
Remennick, L. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.19.2579-a · Cited by 1,507
Zika Virus in the Americas — Yet Another Arbovirus Threat
Fauci, A. S., & Morens, D. M. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1600297 · Cited by 1,075
Alterlife and Decolonial Chemical Relations
Murphy, M. (2017) · Cultural Anthropology · doi:10.14506/ca32.4.02 · Cited by 831
Climate change through the lens of intersectionality
Kaijser, A., & Kronsell, A. (2014) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2013.835203 · Cited by 784
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Asian Communities Reprod. Justice, 2005, A new vision for advancing our movement for reproductive health, reproductive rights, and reproductive justice
- Carson R., 1952, Silent Spring
- Catton WR, 1978, Am. Sociol., 13, 41
- Clarke A, 2018, Making Kin Not Population: Reconceiving Generations
- Colom A., 2015, Privatization and the New Medical Pluralism: Shifting Healthcare Landscapes in Maya Guatemala, 35
- Crenshaw K., 1989, Univ. Chicago Leg. Forum, 1989, 139
- Davis H, 2017, ACME, 16, 761
- Dewachi O., 2015, Med. Anthropol. Theory, 2, 95
- Dow K, 2019, ReproSoc
- Fennell C., 2016, Limn, 7
- Liboiron M., 2013, Lo Squaderno Explor. Space Soc., 29, 9
- Lorenzo R., 2016, Rewire.News
- Murphy M., 2013, Sch. Fem. Online, 11
- Richardson CT., 2006, Guttmacher Policy Rev, 9, 14
- TallBear K., 2011, Fieldsights
- WHO (World Health Organiz.), 2017, Don't Pollute My Future! The Impact of the Environment on Children's Health
- Whyte KP., 2016, Humanities for the Environment: Integrating Knowledge, Forging New Constellations of Practice, 88
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bodin, M., & Björklund, J. (2022) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114985 · Cited by 144
Nading, A. M. (2020) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-010220-074557 · Cited by 134
Yates‐Doerr, E. (2020) · Medical Anthropology Quarterly · doi:10.1111/maq.12586 · Cited by 145
The environmental politics of reproductive choices in the age of climate change
Schneider-Mayerson, M. (2021) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2021.1902700 · Cited by 60
Situated Kinmaking and the Population “Problem”
Dow, K., & Lamoreaux, J. (2020) · Environmental Humanities · doi:10.1215/22011919-8623230 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Lappé, M., Jeffries Hein, R., & Landecker, H.
- Affiliations
- California Polytechnic State University (US)
- Encino, California 91436, USA;
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Anthropology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2019-10-21
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-150
- ISSN
- 0084-6570 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4290
- PMC
- PMC6937137
- OpenAlex
- W2957161348
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 131
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 9.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Annual Review of Anthropology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- John Templeton Foundation
- National Human Genome Research Institute (R00HG009154)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Environmental Movements and Political Ecology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
- Keywords
- reproductive politics, environmental politics, reproductive justice, intersectionality, environmental health, early life environment, developmental origins of health and disease, environmental exposure, environmental activism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review