Cited by 665Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

The Assembly of the First Massive Black Holes

Open access
Inayoshi, Kohei, Visbal, Eli, Haiman, Zoltán·2020·Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics

Abstract

The existence of ∼10 9 M ⊙ supermassive black holes (SMBHs) within the first billion years of the Universe has stimulated numerous ideas for the prompt formation and rapid growth of black holes (BHs) in the early Universe. Here, we review ways in which the seeds of massive BHs may have first assembled, how they may have subsequently grown as massive as ∼10 9 M ⊙ , and how multimessenger observations could distinguish between different SMBH assembly scenarios. We conclude the following: ▪ The ultrarare ∼10 9 M ⊙ SMBHs represent only the tip of the iceberg. Early BHs likely fill a continuum from the stellar-mass (∼10M ⊙ ) to the supermassive (∼10 9 ) regimes, reflecting a range of initial masses and growth histories. ▪ Stellar-mass BHs were likely left behind by the first generation of stars at redshifts as high as ∼30, but their initial growth typically was stunted due to the shallow potential wells of their host galaxies. ▪ Conditions in some larger, metal-poor galaxies soon became conducive to the rapid formation and growth of massive seed holes, via gas accretion and by mergers in dense stellar clusters. ▪ BH masses depend on the environment (such as the number and properties of nearby radiation sources and the local baryonic streaming velocity) and on the metal enrichment and assembly history of the host galaxy. ▪ Distinguishing between assembly mechanisms will be difficult, but a combination of observations by the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (probing massive BH growth via mergers) and by deep multiwavelength electromagnetic observations (probing growth via gas accretion) is particularly promising.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Inayoshi, K., Visbal, E., & Haiman, Z.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • University of Toledo (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2020-08-18
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
27-97
ISSN
  • 0066-4146 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4282
OpenAlex
W2984423540
Cited by
665
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 111 · 2025: 157 · 2024: 130 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1715661, 11991052, NNX15AB19G)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX15AB19G, 2016YFA0400702, NNX17AL82G)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (11950410493, (11721303, 11991052, 2016YFA0400702)
  • Ministry of Urban Development
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
supermassive black holes, black hole formation, black hole growth, early universe, stellar-mass black holes, black hole seeds, gas accretion, black hole mergers, metal-poor galaxies, LISA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review