Activity-Based Profiling of Proteases
Open accessAbstract
Proteolytic enzymes are key signaling molecules in both normal physiological processes and various diseases. After synthesis, protease activity is tightly controlled. Consequently, levels of protease messenger RNA and protein often are not good indicators of total protease activity. To more accurately assign function to new proteases, investigators require methods that can be used to detect and quantify proteolysis. In this review, we describe basic principles, recent advances, and applications of biochemical methods to track protease activity, with an emphasis on the use of activity-based probes (ABPs) to detect protease activity. We describe ABP design principles and use case studies to illustrate the application of ABPs to protease enzymology, discovery and development of protease-targeted drugs, and detection and validation of proteases as biomarkers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some analytical techniques (click chemistry, activity probes, and mass spectrometry-based proteomics) to evaluate binding activity and selectivity in vitro and in vivo are only available for covalent compounds.
“In addition, some analytical techniques such as click chemistry, activity probes, and mass spectrometry-based proteomics to evaluate binding activity and selectivity in vitro and in vivo are only available for covalent compounds [120–124].”
From The design and development of covalent protein-protein interaction inhibitors for cancer treatment (2020) · cites this paper as [122]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 125 · Cited by 330
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Jessani N, Liu Y, Humphrey M, Cravatt BF. 2002. Enzyme activity profiles of the secreted and membrane proteome that depict cancer cell invasiveness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:10335-40 120.
- Authors
- Sanman, L. E., & Bogyo, M.
- Affiliations
- Departments of 1Chemical and Systems Biology,
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2014-06-02
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 249-273
- ISSN
- 0066-4154 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4509
- OpenAlex
- W2159000061
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 125
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 3.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (DGE-114747)
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB005011)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Keywords
- proteolytic enzymes, activity-based probes, protease activity detection
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biochemistry, Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Escherichia coli, Humans, Peptide Hydrolases, Peptides, Substrate Specificity, Drug Design, Biomarkers, Caspases, Proteomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review