Cited by 798RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerRNA modifications and cancer

The Scanning Mechanism of Eukaryotic Translation Initiation

Hinnebusch, Alan G.·2014·Annual Review of Biochemistry

Abstract

In eukaryotes, the translation initiation codon is generally identified by the scanning mechanism, wherein every triplet in the messenger RNA leader is inspected for complementarity to the anticodon of methionyl initiator transfer RNA (Met-tRNA i ). Binding of Met-tRNA i to the small (40S) ribosomal subunit, in a ternary complex (TC) with eIF2-GTP, is stimulated by eukaryotic initiation factor 1 (eIF1), eIF1A, eIF3, and eIF5, and the resulting preinitiation complex (PIC) joins the 5′ end of mRNA preactivated by eIF4F and poly(A)-binding protein. RNA helicases remove secondary structures that impede ribosome attachment and subsequent scanning. Hydrolysis of eIF2-bound GTP is stimulated by eIF5 in the scanning PIC, but completion of the reaction is impeded at non-AUG triplets. Although eIF1 and eIF1A promote scanning, eIF1 and possibly the C-terminal tail of eIF1A must be displaced from the P decoding site to permit base-pairing between Met-tRNA i and the AUG codon, as well as to allow subsequent phosphate release from eIF2-GDP. A second GTPase, eIF5B, catalyzes the joining of the 60S subunit to produce an 80S initiation complex that is competent for elongation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035802

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hinnebusch, A. G.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Hinnebusch, Alan G.
Venue
Annual Review of Biochemistry
Published
2014-06-02
Volume
83
Issue
1
Pages
779-812
ISSN
  • 0066-4154 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4509
OpenAlex
W2145502099
Cited by
798
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 82 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 14
FWCI
7.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
Keywords
translation initiation, scanning mechanism, eukaryotic translation initiation, 40S ribosomal subunit, ternary complex, eIF1, eIF1A, eIF3, eIF5, preinitiation complex, eIF4F, poly(A)-binding protein, RNA helicase, mRNA secondary structure, eIF5B, 80S initiation complex
MeSH terms
Animals, Binding Sites, Guanosine Triphosphate, Humans, Hydrolysis, Methionine, Protein Binding, Ribosomes, RNA, Transfer, Met, Tetrahymena, Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-1, Codon, Initiator, Base Pairing, RNA Helicases, Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-3, Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-5, Ribosome Subunits, Small, Eukaryotic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review