Cited by 892Child Abuse and TraumaChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentStress Responses and Cortisol

Childhood Adversity and Neural Development: A Systematic Review

Open access
McLaughlin, Katie A., Weissman, David, Bitrán, Debbie·2019·Annual Review of Developmental Psychology

Abstract

An extensive literature on childhood adversity and neurodevelopment has emerged over the past decade. We evaluate two conceptual models of adversity and neurodevelopment—the dimensional model of adversity and stress acceleration model—in a systematic review of 109 studies using MRI-based measures of neural structure and function in children and adolescents. Consistent with the dimensional model, children exposed to threat had reduced amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), and hippocampal volume and heightened amygdala activation to threat in a majority of studies; these patterns were not observed consistently in children exposed to deprivation. In contrast, reduced volume and altered function in frontoparietal regions were observed consistently in children exposed to deprivation but not children exposed to threat. Evidence for accelerated development in amygdala-mPFC circuits was limited but emerged in other metrics of neurodevelopment. Progress in charting neurodevelopmental consequences of adversity requires larger samples, longitudinal designs, and more precise assessments of adversity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121318-084950

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reduced amygdalar volume has been suggested as a mechanism for stress sensitization to MDD following exposure to violence in children.

    “Reduced amygdalar volume has been suggested as a mechanism for stress sensitization to MDD following exposure to violence in children (26).”

    From Childhood Trauma, the HPA Axis and Psychiatric Illnesses: A Targeted Literature Synthesis (2022) · cites this paper as [26]

    In ‘Fronto-Amygdala Circuits and Threat Processing > Amygdala Volume’ (page unavailable), the review reports smaller amygdala volume in violence-exposed children and adolescents in four of six studies. It does not identify reduced volume as a mechanism for stress sensitization to major depressive disorder; that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premature closure of the sensitive period for emotional development may lead to poor emotional functioning in the long term.

    “While this is potentially adaptive in the short term, premature closure of the sensitive period for emotional development may lead to poor emotional functioning in the long term (26).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 195 · Cited by 892

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sheridan MA. 2017 Neural consequences ofinfant attachment In The Cultural Nature of Attachment: Contextualizing Relationships and Development, ed. Keller H, Bard K, pp. 231– 44. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Authors
McLaughlin, K. A., Weissman, D., & Bitrán, D.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Developmental Psychology
Published
2019-12-24
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
277-312
ISSN
2640-7922 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2996407267
Cited by
892
References
195
Citations by year
2026: 186 · 2025: 174 · 2024: 164 · 2023: 135 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
9.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r56mh119194-01, 5r37mh119194-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R37-MH119194, R01MH103291, R01MH106482, R56‐MH119194)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
childhood adversity, brain development, threat exposure, deprivation, amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, frontoparietal cortex, amygdala activation, brain structure, children and adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review