The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
On Escalation
Abstract
Organisms have been important agents of selection throughout the history of life. The processes and outcomes of this selection are the subject of this review. Among these, escalation is the most widespread. The primary selective agents are powerful competitors and consumers, which together push many populations toward higher performance in acquiring and defending resources while relegating less competitive species to physiologically marginal settings, where escalation also ensues. The extent to which performance standards rise depends on enabling factors, which control availability of and access to resources. By establishing positive feedbacks between species and enabling factors, effective competitors regulate and enhance resource supply. The pace of escalation toward greater power and reach is dictated by geological factors as well as by growing interdependencies between species and their resources. Evolutionary events on land related to the production of oxygen may have been instrumental in triggering the major episodes of escalation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reciprocal feedbacks between the two main groups of jawed metazoans and invertebrate prey were an important evolutionary feedback loop of the Middle Palaeozoic.
“Reciprocal feedbacks between the two main groups of jawed metazoans and invertebrate prey are here suggested to have been an important evolutionary feedback loop of the Middle Palaeozoic (Brett & Walker 2002, Vermeij 2013).”
From Palaeozoic evolution of animal mouthparts (2017) · cites this paper as Vermeij 2013
The evolution of enhanced defensive structures potentially caused a positive selection for reinforced jaws in the other group (reciprocal selection).
“In turn, the evolution of enhanced defensive structures potentially caused a positive selection for reinforced jaws in the other group (reciprocal selection; Vermeij 2013).”
From Palaeozoic evolution of animal mouthparts (2017) · cites this paper as Vermeij 2013
A Cambrian arms race is typically discussed on a macroevolutionary scale, particularly in the context of escalation.
“A Cambrian arms race is typically discussed on a macroevolutionary scale, particularly in the context of escalation.”
From Adaptive responses in Cambrian predator and prey highlight the arms race during the rise of animals (2025) · cites this paper as [27]
Escalation posits that predators are the main natural selection agents of prey, but generally not vice versa, making selection pressures asymmetric.
“The former posits that predators are the main natural selection agents of prey, but generally not vice versa, making selection pressures asymmetric.”
From Adaptive responses in Cambrian predator and prey highlight the arms race during the rise of animals (2025) · cites this paper as [27]
When viewed in isolation (or an "ecological vacuum"), these data could support coevolution.
“When viewed in isolation (or an “ecological vacuum”), these data could support coevolution.”
From Adaptive responses in Cambrian predator and prey highlight the arms race during the rise of animals (2025) · cites this paper as [27]
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 120 · Cited by 74
Research works printed but not linked: 123
- 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1989.tb01819.x · DOI
- 10.1017/S0094837300013956 · DOI
- Alexander RR, 1986, Les Brachiopodes Fossiles et Actuels, 4, 159
- 10.1080/08912969009386520 · DOI
- 10.1242/jeb.020586 · DOI
- Arthur WB, 2009, The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves
- 10.1038/431261a · DOI
- Bakker RT, 1980, A Cold Look at the Warm-Blooded Dinosaurs, 351
- 10.1017/S0094837300000336 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0016-6995(99)80025-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S1089332600001145 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1101009 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1187443 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.231.4737.495 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.1991.0075 · DOI
- 10.2307/1313226 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00601.x · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2008.1919 · DOI
- 10.2517/1342-8144-15.2.100 · DOI
- 10.1080/02724634.2010.501442 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01410.x · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1197985 · DOI
- 10.1086/282025 · DOI
- Buss LW, 1987, The Evolution of Individuality
- 10.1126/science.1133311 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0389 · DOI
- 10.2307/3544421 · DOI
- Cowen R. 1983. Algal symbiosis and its recognition in the fossil record. See Tevesz & McCall 1983, pp. 431–78 · DOI
- 10.1666/0094-8373-35.4.525 · DOI
- 10.5962/bhl.title.59991 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.1979.0081 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00255.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-0981(03)00047-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.palaeo.2004.03.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.07.013 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0952836904006223 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1106182 · DOI
- 10.1554/0014-3820(2002)056[0284:EAESMV]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0911115107 · DOI
- Edmunds M, 1974, Defence in Animals: A Survey of Anti-Predator Defences
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1964.tb01674.x · DOI
- 10.1666/10015.1 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00015-007-1212-6 · DOI
- 10.1666/09066.1 · DOI
- 10.1666/07008.1 · DOI
- 10.1666/10031.1 · DOI
- Futuyma DJ, 1983, Coevolution, 207
- 10.1073/pnas.0904106106 · DOI
- 10.1038/ngeo923 · DOI
- 10.3354/meps07066 · DOI
- 10.1038/375117a0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.03.044 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0704960104 · DOI
- Hutchinson GE, 1982, Discovery, 16, 3
- Jackson JBC, 1979, Biology and Systematics of Colonial Organisms, 409
- 10.2307/3565565 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature08207 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1118929 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1502-3931.2009.00206.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature08213 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1129378 · DOI
- Labandeira CC, 2006, Geol. Acta, 4, 408
- 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0700 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.684425 · DOI
- 10.1666/0094-8373(2008)034[0264:MGRFSD]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02114.x · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2001.0990 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470999295.ch112 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2010.2648 · DOI
- 10.1666/10049.1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.016 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00188.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0047-6374(03)00147-7 · DOI
- 10.2517/1342-8144-13.1.003 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01700.x · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00357261 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0094837300000312 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1995.tb01105.x · DOI
- 10.1017/S0094837300005121 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1191409 · DOI
- 10.1666/0094-8373(2008)034[0210:EBTICM]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1038/416841a · DOI
- 10.1130/G19616.1 · DOI
- Por FD, 1994, Animal Achievement: A Unifying Theory of Zoology
- 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0662 · DOI
- Schäfer W, 1954, Abh. Senckenb. Naturforsch. Ges., 489, 1
- 10.2110/palo.2009.p09-054r · DOI
- 10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.05.031 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rspb.2011.0968 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0802168105 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0094837300008174 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.264.5159.710 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-0740-3 · DOI
- Thayer CW. 1983. Sediment-mediated biological disturbance and the evolution of marine benthos. See Tevesz & McCall 1983, pp. 479–625 · DOI
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226797670.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226118697.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1666/09045.1 · DOI
- 10.1002/jmor.10881 · DOI
- Turner JS, 2006, The Tinkerer's Apprentice: How Design Emerges from Life Itself
- Van Valen L, 1973, Evol. Theory, 1, 1
- Van Valen L, 1976, Evol. Theory, 1, 179
- 10.1666/0094-8373(2002)028<0527:DAMPC>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.2307/2412953 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.001251 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/303175 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2001.tb01333.x · DOI
- 10.1666/0094-8373(2002)028<0041:CICMSA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Vermeij GJ, 2004, Nature: An Economic History, 10.1515/9781400826490 · DOI
- Vermeij GJ, 2004, Evol. Ecol. Res., 6, 315
- 10.1016/j.palaeo.2008.01.023 · DOI
- Vermeij GJ, 2010, The Evolutionary World: How Adaptation Explains Everything from Seashells to Civilization
- 10.1098/rspb.2010.2362 · DOI
- Vermeij GJ, 2011, Cliodynamics, 2, 187
- 10.2517/1342-8144-15.2.054 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01592.x · DOI
- 10.1890/ES11-00004.1 · DOI
- 10.1666/0094-8373(2000)026<0419:DHATAO>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.214.4524.1024 · DOI
- Willemsen GF, 1992, Scr. Geol., 101, 1
- 10.1371/annotation/53805ecf-7d10-4d99-9cec-f27f5e0d4166 · DOI
- 10.1666/08071.1 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01776.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.palaeo.2011.01.010 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Vermeij, G. J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vermeij, Geerat J.
- ORCID
- Vermeij, Geerat J.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2013-05-30
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-19
- ISSN
- 0084-6597 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4495
- OpenAlex
- W4242724924
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 120
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 0.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Keywords
- escalation, natural selection, competition (biology), predation, resource acquisition, resource defense, positive feedback, enabling factors, resource availability, atmospheric oxygenation, evolutionary history
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review