The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Odorant Reception in Insects: Roles of Receptors, Binding Proteins, and Degrading Enzymes
Abstract
Our knowledge of the molecular basis of odorant reception in insects has grown exponentially over the past decade. Odorant receptors (ORs) from moths, fruit flies, mosquitoes, and the honey bees have been deorphanized, odorant-degrading enzymes (ODEs) have been isolated, and the functions of odorant-binding proteins (OBPs) have been unveiled. OBPs contribute to the sensitivity of the olfactory system by transporting odorants through the sensillar lymph, but there are competing hypotheses on how they act at the end of the journey. A few ODEs that have been demonstrated to degrade odorants rapidly may act in signal inactivation alone or in combination with other molecular traps. Although ORs in Drosophila melanogaster respond to multiple odorants and seem to work in combinatorial code involving both periphery and antennal lobes, reception of sex pheromones by moth ORs suggests that their labeled lines rely heavily on selectivity at the periphery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Novel Family of Divergent Seven-Transmembrane Proteins
Clyne, P. J., Warr, C. G., Freeman, M. R., Lessing, D., Kim, J., & Carlson, J. R. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81093-4 · Cited by 1,155
Divisive Normalization in Olfactory Population Codes
Olsen, S. R., Bhandawat, V., & Wilson, R. I. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.04.009 · Cited by 500
Cited by
Global warming and plant–pollinator mismatches
Gérard, M., Vanderplanck, M., Wood, T., & Michez, D. (2020) · Emerging Topics in Life Sciences · doi:10.1042/etls20190139 · Cited by 303
Olfactory Sensing and Navigation in Turbulent Environments
Reddy, G., Murthy, V. N., & Vergassola, M. (2022) · Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031720-032754 · Cited by 100
Single amino acid residue mediates reciprocal specificity in two mosquito odorant receptors
Franco, F. P., Xu, P., Harris, B. J., Yarov-Yarovoy, V., & Leal, W. S. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.82922 · Cited by 14
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Leal, W. S.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Entomology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2013-01-07
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 373-391
- ISSN
- 0066-4170 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4487
- OpenAlex
- W2127016153
- Cited by
- 1,705
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Odorant Reception in Insects: Roles of Receptors, Binding Proteins, and Degrading Enzymes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153635
- The paper
- Leal, W. S. (2013). Odorant Reception in Insects: Roles of Receptors, Binding Proteins, and Degrading Enzymes. Annual Review of Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153635
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.