The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Textual Analysis in Finance
Open accessAbstract
Textual analysis, implemented at scale, has become an important addition to the methodological toolbox of finance. In this review, given the proliferation of papers now using this method, we first provide an updated survey of the literature while focusing on a few broad topics—social media, political bias, and detecting fraud. We do not attempt to survey the various statistical methods and instead initially focus on the construction and use of lexicons in finance. We then center the discussion on readability as an attribute frequently incorporated in contemporaneous research, arguing that its use begs the question of what we are measuring. Finally, we discuss how the literature might build on the intent of measuring readability to measure something more appropriate and more broadly relevant—complexity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(93)90023-5 · Cited by 25,754
Giving content to investor sentiment: The role of media in the stock market
TETLOCK, P. C. (2007) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01232.x · Cited by 4,827
The evolution of 10-K textual disclosure: Evidence from Latent Dirichlet Allocation
Dyer, T., Lang, M., & Stice-Lawrence, L. (2017) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.07.002 · Cited by 841
Gentzkow, M., Shapiro, J. M., & Taddy, M. (2019) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta16566 · Cited by 419
Cited by
ChatGPT and Deepseek: Can They Predict the Stock Market and Macroeconomy?
Chen, J., Tang, G., Zhou, G., & Zhu, W. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.10008 · Cited by 6
Artificial intelligence (AI) and corporate governance: Evidence from board size
Chatjuthamard, P., Jiraporn, P., & Lee, S. M. (2026) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2026.101144 · Cited by 4
Can Soft Information Survive Organizational Distance? Evidence from SMB Lending
Cerchiello, P., Filomeni, S., Tanda, A., & Toma, A. M. (2025) · European Accounting Review · doi:10.1080/09638180.2024.2447356
Can soft information survive organizational distance? Evidence from SMB lending
Cerchiello, P., Filomeni, S., & Tanda, A. (2025) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5065824
Metadata
- Authors
- Loughran, T., & McDonald, B.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Financial Economics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2020-11-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 357-375
- ISSN
- 1941-1367 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-1375
- OpenAlex
- W3013505582
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.