Cited by 395Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchGenomics and Rare Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 210 of the 210 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic and Epigenetic Networks in Intellectual Disabilities

van Bokhoven, Hans·2011·Annual Review of Genetics

Abstract

Mutations in more than 450 different genes have been associated with intellectual disability (ID) and related cognitive disorders (CDs), such as autism. It is to be expected that this number will increase three to fourfold in the next years due to the rapid implementation of innovative high-throughput sequencing technology in genetics labs. Numerous functional relationships have been identified between the products of individual ID genes, and common molecular and cellular pathways onto which these networks converge are beginning to emerge. Prominent examples are genes involved in synaptic plasticity, Ras and Rho GTPase signaling, and epigenetic genes that encode modifiers of the chromatin structure. It thus seems that there might be common pathological patterns in ID, despite its bewildering genetic heterogeneity. These common pathways provide attractive opportunities for knowledge-based therapeutic interventions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132512

Cites

210 of 210 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 210 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. American Psychiatric Association. 1994.The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders(DSM)fourth edition(DSM-IV)
  2. 10.1037//0033-2909.96.3.518 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 395

Metadata

Authors
van Bokhoven, H.
Affiliations
Molecular Neurogenetics Unit, Department of Human Genetics, Nijmegen Center for Molecular Life Sciences, and Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen Medical Center, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
Venue
Annual Review of Genetics
Published
2011-12-15
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
81-104
ISSN
  • 0066-4197 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2948
OpenAlex
W2160616996
Cited by
382
References
210
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 18
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
intellectual disability, cognitive disorders, autism spectrum disorder, gene networks, epigenetic networks, synaptic plasticity, Ras signaling, Rho GTPase signaling, chromatin structure, genetic heterogeneity, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Chromosome Aberrations, Chromosomes, Human, Cognition Disorders, Cytoskeletal Proteins, Humans, Intellectual Disability, Mutation, Spine, Synapses, Transcription, Genetic, Signal Transduction, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Epigenesis, Genetic, Gene Regulatory Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review