The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Tension Between Data Sharing and the Protection of Privacy in Genomics Research
Open accessAbstract
Next-generation sequencing and global data sharing challenge many of the governance mechanisms currently in place to protect the privacy of research participants. These challenges will make it more difficult to guarantee anonymity for participants, provide information to satisfy the requirements of informed consent, and ensure complete withdrawal from research when requested. To move forward, we need to improve the current governance systems for research so that they are responsive to individual privacy concerns but can also be effective at a global level. We need to develop a system of e-governance that can complement existing governance systems but that places greater reliance on the use of technology to ensure compliance with ethical and legal requirements. These new governance structures must be able to address the concerns of research participants while at the same time ensuring effective data sharing that promotes public trust in genomics research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Data privacy is an important concern when it comes to genomic data.19,20”
From CLASTR: The Cellosaurus STR similarity search tool ‐ A precious help for cell line authentication (2020) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“For instance, the advancements towards privacy-enabled networks and infrastructures puzzles some academics [75] who afraid that the same mechanisms have been put in place to protect the privacy of data (like de-identification) may actually make it very difficult to trace and remove individual derived data in order to allow participants to withdraw completely their consent and be forgotten.”
From Forgetting personal data and revoking consent under the GDPR: Challenges and proposed solutions (2018) · cites this paper as [75]
In the citing paper
“In such situations, as Kaye [75] underscores, it may be only possible to prohibit the entry of new information and samples into the system.”
From Forgetting personal data and revoking consent under the GDPR: Challenges and proposed solutions (2018) · cites this paper as [75]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cook, R. J., Dickens, B. M., & Fathalla, M. F. (2003) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199241323.003.0025 · Cited by 10,825
Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls
The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Management Committee, Burton, P. R., Clayton, D. G., Cardon, L. R., Craddock, N., Deloukas, P., Duncanson, A., Kwiatkowski, D. P., McCarthy, M. I., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05911 · Cited by 9,442
The Human Genome Project: Lessons from Large-Scale Biology
Collins, F. S., Morgan, M., & Patrinos, A. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1084564 · Cited by 1,284
Homer, N., Szelinger, S., Redman, M., Duggan, D., Tembe, W., Muehling, J., Pearson, J. V., Stephan, D. A., Nelson, S. F., & Craig, D. W. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000167 · Cited by 1,221
A decade’s perspective on DNA sequencing technology
Mardis, E. R. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09796 · Cited by 965
Little, J., Higgins, J. P. T., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Moher, D., Gagnon, F., von Elm, E., Khoury, M. J., Cohen, B., Davey-Smith, G., Grimshaw, J., et al. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000022 · Cited by 811
Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations
Wolf, S. M., Lawrenz, F. P., Nelson, C. A., Kahn, J. P., Cho, M. K., Clayton, E. W., Fletcher, J. G., Georgieff, M., Hammerschmidt, D. E., Hudson, K., et al. (2008) · The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics · doi:10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.00266.x · Cited by 710
the eMERGE Team, McCarty, C. A., Chisholm, R. L., Chute, C. G., Kullo, I. J., Jarvik, G. P., Larson, E. B., Li, R., Masys, D. R., Ritchie, M. D., et al. (2011) · BMC Medical Genomics · doi:10.1186/1755-8794-4-13 · Cited by 701
Assessment of cumulative evidence on genetic associations: interim guidelines
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Boffetta, P., Little, J., O'Brien, T. R., Uitterlinden, A. G., Vineis, P., Balding, D. J., Chokkalingam, A. P., Dolan, S. M., Flanders, W. D., et al. (2007) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dym159 · Cited by 554
The Human Genome Project: Past, Present, and Future
Watson, J. D. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2181665 · Cited by 537
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ethical Machine Learning in Healthcare
Chen, I. Y., Pierson, E., Rose, S., Joshi, S., Ferryman, K., & Ghassemi, M. (2021) · Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-092820-114757 · Cited by 645
Paediatric genomics: diagnosing rare disease in children
Wright, C. F., FitzPatrick, D. R., & Firth, H. V. (2018) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.116 · Cited by 654
The European Genome-phenome Archive of human data consented for biomedical research
Lappalainen, I., Almeida, J. P., Kumanduri, V., Senf, A., Spalding, D., Ur-Rehman, S., Saunders, G. I., Kandasamy, J., Cáccamo, M., Leinonen, R., et al. (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3312 · Cited by 366
Rights, Interests and Expectations: Indigenous Perspectives on Unrestricted Access to Genomic Data
Hudson, M., Garrison, N. A., Sterling, R., Caron, N. R., Fox, K., Yracheta, J., Anderson, J., Wilcox, P., Arbour, L., Brown, A., et al. (2020) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-0228-x · Cited by 320
Forgetting personal data and revoking consent under the GDPR: Challenges and proposed solutions
Politou, E., Alepis, E., & Patsakis, C. (2018) · Journal of Cybersecurity · doi:10.1093/cybsec/tyy001 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaye, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kaye, Jane
- ORCID
- Kaye, Jane
- Venue
- Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2012-09-22
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 415-431
- ISSN
- 1527-8204 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-293X
- PMC
- PMC4337968
- OpenAlex
- W2156908711
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (096599/2/11/Z, 096599)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Keywords
- data sharing, privacy preservation, genomics, research participant privacy, anonymity, informed consent, withdrawal from research, research governance, digital governance, next-generation sequencing, public trust
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Informed Consent, International Cooperation, Tissue Banks, Genome, Human, Ethics Committees, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Genomics, Ethical Review, Genetic Privacy, Information Dissemination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
