Cited by 108Hormonal Regulation and HypertensionBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesRenin-Angiotensin System Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Hyperaldosteronism as a Common Cause of Resistant Hypertension

Calhoun, David A.·2013·Annual Review of Medicine

Abstract

Resistant hypertension affects an estimated 10–15 million American adults and is increasing in prevalence. The etiology of resistant hypertension is almost always multifactorial, including obesity, older age, high dietary salt, chronic kidney disease, and aldosterone excess. Classical primary aldosteronism and lesser degrees of aldosterone excess, possibly originating from visceral adipocytes, contribute broadly to antihypertensive treatment resistance. Treatment of resistant hypertension is predicated on appropriate lifestyle changes and use of effective combinations of antihypertensive agents from different classes. Blockade of aldosterone with spironolactone has been shown to be particularly effective for treatment of resistant hypertension. The antihypertensive benefit of spironolactone is not limited to patients with demonstrable hyperaldosteronism but instead can be effective in resistant hypertensive patients regardless of aldosterone levels. Chlorthalidone is a potent, long-acting thiazide-like diuretic and should be used preferentially to treat resistant hypertension as it is superior to normally used doses of hydrochlorothiazide.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-med-042711-135929

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists are queued

They are fetched later and appear here then.

References 46 · Cited by 108

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Caro JJ, 1999, Can. Med. Assoc. J., 160, 41
  2. Mo L, 2007, Zhonghua Zue Zhi, 87, 1177
  3. Conn JW, 1955, J. Lab. Clin. Med., 45, 3

Metadata

Authors
Calhoun, D. A.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Calhoun, David A.
Venue
Annual Review of Medicine
Published
2013-01-14
Volume
64
Issue
1
Pages
233-247
ISSN
  • 0066-4219 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-326X
OpenAlex
W2137197948
Cited by
108
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
Keywords
resistant hypertension, hyperaldosteronism, primary aldosteronism, aldosterone excess, spironolactone, chlorthalidone, thiazide diuretics, hydrochlorothiazide, antihypertensive therapy, visceral adipose tissue, obesity, chronic kidney disease, dietary salt
MeSH terms
Blood Pressure, Humans, Hyperaldosteronism, Hypertension, Risk Factors, United States, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review