Cited by 240Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Anxiety, Depression, and Decision Making: A Computational Perspective

Bishop, Sonia J., Gagne, Christopher·2018·Annual Review of Neuroscience

Abstract

In everyday life, the outcomes of our actions are rarely certain. Further, we often lack the information needed to precisely estimate the probability and value of potential outcomes as well as how much effort will be required by the courses of action under consideration. Under such conditions of uncertainty, individual differences in the estimation and weighting of these variables, and in reliance on model-free versus model-based decision making, have the potential to strongly influence our behavior. Both anxiety and depression are associated with difficulties in decision making. Further, anxiety is linked to increased engagement in threat-avoidance behaviors and depression is linked to reduced engagement in reward-seeking behaviors. The precise deficits, or biases, in decision making associated with these common forms of psychopathology remain to be fully specified. In this article, we review evidence for which of the computations supporting decision making are altered in anxiety and depression and consider the potential consequences for action selection. In addition, we provide a schematic framework that integrates the findings reviewed and will hopefully be of value to future studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-neuro-080317-062007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 90 · Cited by 240

Authors
Bishop, S. J., & Gagne, C.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA;
Venue
Annual Review of Neuroscience
Published
2018-07-08
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
371-388
ISSN
  • 0147-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4126
OpenAlex
W2800201914
Cited by
240
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 6
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University College London
  • University of Oxford
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
anxiety, depression, decision-making, uncertainty, threat avoidance, reward seeking, individual differences, computational psychiatry, action selection
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety, Computer Simulation, Decision Making, Depression, Humans, Reward

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review