The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Synaptic Mechanisms Regulating Mood State Transitions in Depression
Open accessAbstract
Depression is an episodic form of mental illness characterized by mood state transitions with poorly understood neurobiological mechanisms. Antidepressants reverse the effects of stress and depression on synapse function, enhancing neurotransmission, increasing plasticity, and generating new synapses in stress-sensitive brain regions. These properties are shared to varying degrees by all known antidepressants, suggesting that synaptic remodeling could play a key role in depression pathophysiology and antidepressant function. Still, it is unclear whether and precisely how synaptogenesis contributes to mood state transitions. Here, we review evidence supporting an emerging model in which depression is defined by a distinct brain state distributed across multiple stress-sensitive circuits, with neurons assuming altered functional properties, synapse configurations, and, importantly, a reduced capacity for plasticity and adaptation. Antidepressants act initially by facilitating plasticity and enabling a functional reconfiguration of this brain state. Subsequently, synaptogenesis plays a specific role in sustaining these changes over time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Synaptic plasticity alone is insufficient for antidepressant response; dynamic regulation of intrinsic excitability acts in parallel to shape circuit output, resilience, and vulnerability.
“Yet synaptic plasticity alone is insufficient. Dynamic regulation of intrinsic excitability, through ion channel dependent control of neuronal gain and firing probability, acts in parallel to shape circuit output, resilience, and vulnerability [32,33].”
From Synaptic Plasticity—Intrinsic Excitability and Antidepressant Discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [32]
The Introduction and Conclusions and Future Directions distinguish early changes in circuit activity from later synapse formation that helps sustain remission. The section on rodent chronic-stress models also links altered neuronal excitability to stress susceptibility. However, the cited paper does not establish the more specific claim that ion-channel-dependent regulation of intrinsic excitability acts in parallel with synaptic plasticity to determine antidepressant response, resilience, and vulnerability. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 161 · Cited by 101
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Hirschfeld RM., 2000, J. Clin. Psychiatry, 61, 4
- Salas R, 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci., 4, 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Parekh, P. K., Johnson, S. B., & Liston, C.
- Affiliations
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2022-07-08
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 581-601
- ISSN
- 0147-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4126
- PMC
- PMC11577286
- OpenAlex
- W4229007163
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 161
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Hope for Depression Research Foundation
- National Institute of Mental Health (K99MH127291, R01MH123154, R01MH109685, R01MH118451)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (RF1NS126073)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- depression, synaptic plasticity, synaptogenesis, antidepressants, synaptic remodeling, neural adaptation, depression pathophysiology
- MeSH terms
- Antidepressive Agents, Depression, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Synapses
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review