The DOI matches its Crossref record; 129 of the 129 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonempirical Interactions for the Nuclear Shell Model: An Update
Open accessAbstract
The nuclear shell model has perhaps been the most important conceptual and computational paradigm for the understanding of the structure of atomic nuclei. While the shell model has been used predominantly in a phenomenological context, there have been efforts stretching back more than half a century to derive shell model parameters based on a realistic interaction between nucleons. More recently, several ab initio many-body methods—in particular, many-body perturbation theory, the no-core shell model, the in-medium similarity renormalization group, and coupled-cluster theory—have developed the capability to provide effective shell model Hamiltonians. We provide an update on the status of these methods and investigate the connections between them and their potential strengths and weaknesses, with a particular focus on the in-medium similarity renormalization group approach. Three-body forces are demonstrated to be important for understanding the modifications needed in phenomenological treatments. We then review some applications of these methods to comparisons with recent experimental measurements, and conclude with some remaining challenges in ab initio shell model theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The renormalization group and the ε expansion
Wilson, K. (1974) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(74)90023-4 · Cited by 5,179
The renormalization group: Critical phenomena and the Kondo problem
Wilson, K. G. (1975) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.47.773 · Cited by 4,522
Lanczos, C. (1950) · Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards · doi:10.6028/jres.045.026 · Cited by 4,391
Unified theory of nuclear reactions
Feshbach, H. (1958) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(58)90007-1 · Cited by 2,978
Local phenomenological nucleon-nucleon potentials
Reid, R. V. (1968) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(68)90126-7 · Cited by 2,596
Hartree-Fock Calculations with Skyrme's Interaction. I. Spherical Nuclei
Vautherin, D., & Brink, D. M. (1972) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.5.626 · Cited by 1,979
Modern theory of nuclear forces
Epelbaum, E., Hammer, H.-W., & Meißner, U.-G. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1773 · Cited by 1,883
The principle of minimized iterations in the solution of the matrix eigenvalue problem
Arnoldi, W. E. (1951) · Quarterly of Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1090/qam/42792 · Cited by 1,818
Table of experimental nuclear ground state charge radii: An update
Angeli, I., & Marinova, K. P. (2013) · Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables · doi:10.1016/j.adt.2011.12.006 · Cited by 1,744
Chiral effective field theory and nuclear forces
Machleidt, R., & Entem, D. R. (2011) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2011.02.001 · Cited by 1,612
Cited by
A Guided Tour of ab initio Nuclear Many-Body Theory
Hergert, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00379 · Cited by 269
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stroberg, S. R., Hergert, H., Bogner, S. K., & Holt, J. D.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2019-10-19
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 307-362
- ISSN
- 0163-8998 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4134
- OpenAlex
- W2966297531
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 129
- FWCI
- 2.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonempirical Interactions for the Nuclear Shell Model: An Update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-021120
- The paper
- Stroberg, S. R., Hergert, H., Bogner, S. K., & Holt, J. D. (2019). Nonempirical Interactions for the Nuclear Shell Model: An Update. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-021120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.