Homeostatic Control of Presynaptic Neurotransmitter Release
Abstract
It is well established that the active properties of nerve and muscle cells are stabilized by homeostatic signaling systems. In organisms ranging from Drosophila to humans, neurons restore baseline function in the continued presence of destabilizing perturbations by rebalancing ion channel expression, modifying neurotransmitter receptor surface expression and trafficking, and modulating neurotransmitter release. This review focuses on the homeostatic modulation of presynaptic neurotransmitter release, termed presynaptic homeostasis. First, we highlight criteria that can be used to define a process as being under homeostatic control. Next, we review the remarkable conservation of presynaptic homeostasis at the Drosophila, mouse, and human neuromuscular junctions and emerging parallels at synaptic connections in the mammalian central nervous system. We then highlight recent progress identifying cellular and molecular mechanisms. We conclude by reviewing emerging parallels between the mechanisms of homeostatic signaling and genetic links to neurological disease.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Because the delayed presynaptic modification was specific to aligned nanoclusters, nanocolumns may point to an alignment-specific, retrograde presynaptic compensation following postsynaptic depression.
“Because the delayed presynaptic modification was specific to aligned NCs, it may be that nanocolumns point to an alignment-specific, retrograde presynaptic compensation following postsynaptic depression (Fig. 4j), potentially relating to previous reports of presynaptic homeostatic plasticity22.”
From A trans-synaptic nanocolumn aligns neurotransmitter release to receptors (2016) · cites this paper as [22]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 112 · Cited by 261
- Authors
- Davis, G. W., & Müller, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Physiology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2015-02-10
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 251-270
- ISSN
- 0066-4278 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1585
- OpenAlex
- W2135286498
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 112
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Keywords
- neurotransmitter release, neuromuscular junction, ion channel expression, Drosophila, mice, human, central nervous system synapses
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Drosophila, Homeostasis, Humans, Neuromuscular Junction, Neuronal Plasticity, Signal Transduction, Presynaptic Terminals, Neurotransmitter Agents, Models, Animal, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review