Active Forgetting: Adaptation of Memory by Prefrontal Control
Open accessAbstract
Over the past century, psychologists have discussed whether forgetting might arise from active mechanisms that promote memory loss to achieve various functions, such as minimizing errors, facilitating learning, or regulating one's emotional state. The past decade has witnessed a great expansion in knowledge about the brain mechanisms underlying active forgetting in its varying forms. A core discovery concerns the role of the prefrontal cortex in exerting top-down control over mnemonic activity in the hippocampus and other brain structures, often via inhibitory control. New findings reveal that such processes not only induce forgetting of specific memories but also can suppress the operation of mnemonic processes more broadly, triggering windows of anterograde and retrograde amnesia in healthy people. Recent work extends active forgetting to nonhuman animals, presaging the development of a multilevel mechanistic account that spans the cognitive, systems, network, and even cellular levels. This work reveals how organisms adapt their memories to their cognitive and emotional goals and has implications for understanding vulnerability to psychiatric disorders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In addition to passive forgetting, humans can achieve active regulation of the memory system through a mechanism that suppresses redundant information to facilitate the storage and retrieval of key memory, termed active forgetting.
“some studies [99, 100, 101, 102] suggested that in addition to passive forgetting, humans can also achieve active regulation of the memory system through a mechanism that suppresses redundant information to facilitate the storage and retrieval of key memory. This type of forgetting mechanism is termed 'active forgetting'.”
From Human-inspired Perspectives: A Survey on AI Long-term Memory (2024) · cites this paper as [102]
Offloading is linked to intentional forgetting.
“A recent paper links offloading to intentional forgetting”
From The Cognitive Architecture of Digital Externalization (2023) · cites this paper as Anderson & Hulbert, 2021
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 180 · Cited by 279
- Authors
- Anderson, M. C., & Hulbert, J. C.
- Affiliations
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
- Bard College (US)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2021-01-04
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-36
- ISSN
- 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2085
- OpenAlex
- W3086404580
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 180
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 4.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Apollo (cc-by)
- Funders
- Mind Science Foundation
- Medical Research Council (MC- A060-5PR00)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- active forgetting, prefrontal cortex, top-down control, inhibitory control, hippocampus, anterograde amnesia, retrograde amnesia, memory suppression, emotion regulation, psychiatric vulnerability
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Brain, Hippocampus, Humans, Memory, Mental Recall, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review