Cited by 76Health disparities and outcomesPublic Health and Social InequalitiesHealthcare Policy and Management

Clinical Care and Health Disparities

Starfield, B., Gérvas, J., Mangin, D.·2012·Annual Review of Public Health

Abstract

Health disparities, also known as health inequities, are systematic and potentially remediable differences in one or more aspects of health across population groups defined socially, economically, demographically, or geographically. This topic has been the subject of research stretching back at least decades. Reports and studies have delved into how inequities develop in different societies and, with particular regard to health services, in access to and financing of health systems. In this review, we consider empirical studies from the United States and elsewhere, and we focus on how one aspect of health systems, clinical care, contributes to maintaining systematic differences in health across population groups characterized by social disadvantage. We consider inequities in clinical care and the policies that influence them. We develop a framework for considering the structural and behavioral components of clinical care and review the existing literature for evidence that is likely to be generalizable across health systems over time. Starting with the assumption that health services, as one aspect of social services, ought to enhance equity in health care, we conclude with a discussion of threats to that role and what might be done about them.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124528

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A greater emphasis on person-focused primary care (instead of disease-focused care) would better address the health care needs of patients and reduce inequities in health.

    “Research reveals that a greater emphasis on person-focused primary care (instead of disease-focused care) would better address the health care needs of patients and reduce inequities in health [62].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 117 · Cited by 76

Authors
Starfield, B., Gérvas, J., & Mangin, D.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Escuela Nacional de Sanidad (ES)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
Venue
Annual Review of Public Health
Published
2012-04-21
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
89-106
ISSN
  • 0163-7525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2093
OpenAlex
W2139763569
Cited by
76
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
health disparities, clinical care, social deprivation, health equity, health policy, health care access, health care financing, structural determinants of health, behavioral determinants of health, health care system
MeSH terms
Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Quality of Health Care, Social Work, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Population Groups, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review