Clinical Care and Health Disparities
Abstract
Health disparities, also known as health inequities, are systematic and potentially remediable differences in one or more aspects of health across population groups defined socially, economically, demographically, or geographically. This topic has been the subject of research stretching back at least decades. Reports and studies have delved into how inequities develop in different societies and, with particular regard to health services, in access to and financing of health systems. In this review, we consider empirical studies from the United States and elsewhere, and we focus on how one aspect of health systems, clinical care, contributes to maintaining systematic differences in health across population groups characterized by social disadvantage. We consider inequities in clinical care and the policies that influence them. We develop a framework for considering the structural and behavioral components of clinical care and review the existing literature for evidence that is likely to be generalizable across health systems over time. Starting with the assumption that health services, as one aspect of social services, ought to enhance equity in health care, we conclude with a discussion of threats to that role and what might be done about them.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A greater emphasis on person-focused primary care (instead of disease-focused care) would better address the health care needs of patients and reduce inequities in health.
“Research reveals that a greater emphasis on person-focused primary care (instead of disease-focused care) would better address the health care needs of patients and reduce inequities in health [62].”
From Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action (2019) · cites this paper as [62]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 117 · Cited by 76
- Authors
- Starfield, B., Gérvas, J., & Mangin, D.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Escuela Nacional de Sanidad (ES)
- University of Otago (NZ)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Annual Review of Public Health
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2012-04-21
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-106
- ISSN
- 0163-7525 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2093
- OpenAlex
- W2139763569
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 117
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Keywords
- health disparities, clinical care, social deprivation, health equity, health policy, health care access, health care financing, structural determinants of health, behavioral determinants of health, health care system
- MeSH terms
- Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Quality of Health Care, Social Work, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Population Groups, Health Status Disparities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review