From Social Structure to Gene Regulation, and Back: A Critical Introduction to Environmental Epigenetics for Sociology
Abstract
Epigenetics is a burgeoning area of biomedical research into the mechanisms by which genes are regulated—how the activity of producing proteins is controlled. Although molecular epigenetic research is highly biochemical, it is of interest to sociologists because some epigenetic changes are environmentally mediated and can persist across the life span or into further generations. Environmental epigenetic research tracks mechanisms by which social forces—from pollution to nutrition to mothering to traumatic experience—become molecularly embodied, affect gene expression, and induce durable changes in behavior and health. We begin with an introduction to the science of environmental epigenetics focused on articulating the logic of experimentation and explanation in this field. Turning to sociologists' key interests, we review the growing literature on epigenetics of socioeconomic status. Finally, we consider how epigenetics offers opportunities and challenges for sociological research on both empirical and theoretical grounds.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Epigenetics and DOHaD provide a biosocial framework for understanding how behaviors during pregnancy can impact fetal and infant development.
“Together, epigenetics—the study of gene–environment interaction and regulation—and DOHaD—the study of how early adverse exposure can impact health across the life course—provide a biosocial framework for understanding how behaviors during pregnancy can impact fetal and infant development (Landecker and Panofsky 2013; Barker 2007).”
From The Politics of Postgenomic Reproduction: Exploring Pregnant Narratives from within a Clinical Trial (2022) · cites this paper as Landecker and Panofsky 2013
Stochasticism, or the unpredictable and indeterminate aspects of epigenetic modifications, is often ignored in the application and examination of studies that target pregnant bodies.
“Stochasticism, or the unpredictable and indeterminate aspects of epigenetic modifications, is often ignored in the application and examination of studies that target pregnant bodies (Landecker and Panofsky 2013).”
From The Politics of Postgenomic Reproduction: Exploring Pregnant Narratives from within a Clinical Trial (2022) · cites this paper as Landecker and Panofsky 2013
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 131 · Cited by 465
- Authors
- Landecker, H., & Panofsky, A.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- Annual Review of Sociology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2013-07-30
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 333-357
- ISSN
- 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2115
- OpenAlex
- W2146967055
- Cited by
- 465
- References
- 131
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 12
- FWCI
- 2.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
- Keywords
- environmental epigenetics, gene expression regulation, gene expression, social structure, socioeconomic status, epigenetic inheritance, social determinants of health, maternal care, trauma, pollution, nutrition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review