The DOI matches its Crossref record; 113 of the 113 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional Regression
Open accessAbstract
Functional data analysis (FDA) involves the analysis of data whose ideal units of observation are functions defined on some continuous domain, and the observed data consist of a sample of functions taken from some population, sampled on a discrete grid. Ramsay & Silverman's (1997) textbook sparked the development of this field, which has accelerated in the past 10 years to become one of the fastest growing areas of statistics, fueled by the growing number of applications yielding this type of data. One unique characteristic of FDA is the need to combine information both across and within functions, which Ramsay and Silverman called replication and regularization, respectively. This article focuses on functional regression, the area of FDA that has received the most attention in applications and methodological development. First, there is an introduction to basis functions, key building blocks for regularization in functional regression methods, followed by an overview of functional regression methods, split into three types: (a) functional predictor regression (scalar-on-function), (b) functional response regression (function-on-scalar), and (c) function-on-function regression. For each, the role of replication and regularization is discussed and the methodological development described in a roughly chronological manner, at times deviating from the historical timeline to group together similar methods. The primary focus is on modeling and methodology, highlighting the modeling structures that have been developed and the various regularization approaches employed. The review concludes with a brief discussion describing potential areas of future development in this field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25
Zhang, Y., Sutton, C. A., Storkey, A., & Zoubin Ghahramani, A. (2012) · Cited by 12,653
Random-Effects Models for Longitudinal Data
Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (1982) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529876 · Cited by 8,923
An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias
Zellner, A. (1962) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1962.10480664 · Cited by 8,401
Wood, S. N. (2011) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00749.x · Cited by 7,537
Wood, S. N. (2006) · doi:10.1201/9781420010404 · Cited by 4,953
Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties
Eilers, P. H. C., & Marx, B. D. (1996) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1038425655 · Cited by 3,666
Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (1986) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177013604 · Cited by 3,409
Park, T., & Casella, G. (2008) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214508000000337 · Cited by 2,934
Variable Selection via Gibbs Sampling
George, E. I., & McCulloch, R. E. (1993) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1993.10476353 · Cited by 2,828
Research works printed but not linked: 59
- 10.1016/j.jspi.2005.06.002 · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2005.06.002
- 10.2307/2532951 · doi:10.2307/2532951
- 10.2307/2348407 · doi:10.2307/2348407
- 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00768.x · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00768.x
- 10.1111/1467-9469.00329 · doi:10.1111/1467-9469.00329
- 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01524.x · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01524.x
- 10.5705/ss.2009.207 · doi:10.5705/ss.2009.207
- 10.1007/BF01437406 · doi:10.1007/bf01437406
- 10.1111/1467-9876.00047 · doi:10.1111/1467-9876.00047
- 10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.00174.x · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00174.x
- Donoho DL, 1995, Ann. Stat., 26, 879
- 10.1198/106186002844 · doi:10.1198/106186002844
- 10.1080/00401706.1997.10485118 · doi:10.1080/00401706.1997.10485118
- Fox EB, 2012, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 25, 746
- 10.1198/jasa.2010.tm09132 · doi:10.1198/jasa.2010.tm09132
- 10.1198/016214503000000549 · doi:10.1198/016214503000000549
- 10.1198/00401700152404273 · doi:10.1198/00401700152404273
- 10.1016/j.csda.2006.09.034 · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2006.09.034
- Hastie T, 1993, Technology, 35, 140
- Herrick RC, 2006, Joint Stat. Meet. 2006 Proc., ASA Sect. Stat. Comput., Seattle, 2051
- Huang JZ, 2004, Stat. Sin., 14, 763
- Joliffe IT, 1982, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C, 31, 300
- 10.1016/j.jspi.2010.11.003 · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2010.11.003
- 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00980.x · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00980.x
- 10.1093/biomet/asr032 · doi:10.1093/biomet/asr032
- Kundu MG, Harezlak J, Randolph TW. 2012. Longitudinal functional models with structured penalties. arXiv:1211.4763 [stat.AP] · arXiv
- 10.1016/j.jmva.2011.08.005 · doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2011.08.005
- 10.1177/1471082X0800800403 · doi:10.1177/1471082x0800800403
- 10.1214/10-AOS813 · doi:10.1214/10-aos813
- 10.1198/jasa.2010.tm09313 · doi:10.1198/jasa.2010.tm09313
- 10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.297 · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.297
- 10.1093/biomet/91.1.177 · doi:10.1093/biomet/91.1.177
- 10.5705/ss.2010.034 · doi:10.5705/ss.2010.034
- 10.1016/j.csda.2011.11.014 · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2011.11.014
- 10.1002/cjs.10062 · doi:10.1002/cjs.10062
- 10.1198/004017004000000626 · doi:10.1198/004017004000000626
- 10.1016/j.chemolab.2011.08.006 · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2011.08.006
- McLean MW, Scheipl F, Hooker G, Greven S, Ruppert D. 2013. Bayesian functional generalized additive models with sparsely observed covariates . arXiv:1305.3585 [stat.ME] · arXiv
- 10.1198/016214503000000422 · doi:10.1198/016214503000000422
- 10.1016/j.jspi.2010.04.044 · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2010.04.044
- 10.1198/108571102339 · doi:10.1198/108571102339
- 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj003 · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxj003
- 10.1198/jcgs.2009.06109 · doi:10.1198/jcgs.2009.06109
- 10.1002/sim.1067 · doi:10.1002/sim.1067
- 10.1002/sim.1068 · doi:10.1002/sim.1068
- Scheipl F, Staicu AM, Greven S. 2014. Functional additive mixed models. J. Comput. Gr. Stat. In press
- Shi M, 1996, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C, 45, 151
- 10.1198/016214503000035 · doi:10.1198/016214503000035
- 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00829.x · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00829.x
- 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.09.030 · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.09.030
- Wu CO, 2000, Stat. Sin., 10, 433
- 10.1080/01621459.1998.10473800 · doi:10.1080/01621459.1998.10473800
- 10.1111/j.1467-9469.2004.00369.x · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9469.2004.00369.x
- 10.1214/009053605000000660 · doi:10.1214/009053605000000660
- 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00713.x · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00713.x
- Zhang L, Baladandayuthapani V, Zhu H, Baggerly KA, Majewski TA, et al. 2015. Functional CAR models for large spatially correlated functional datasets. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. In press · doi:10.1080/01621459.2015.1042581
- 10.1093/biomet/asn035 · doi:10.1093/biomet/asn035
- 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01765.x · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01765.x
- 10.1214/09-LNMS5711 · doi:10.1214/09-lnms5711
Cited by
DeSalvio, A. J., Adak, A., Murray, S. C., Jarquín, D., Winans, N. D., Crozier, D., & Rooney, W. L. (2024) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.1002/tpg2.20454 · Cited by 21
“…regression, in which observations are functions outlined on a continuous domain, has also been implemented in PS for yield prediction, leading to greater parsimony among regression models and higher computational efficiency (Lane et al., 2020; Montesinos-López et al., 2018, 2017; Morris, 2015).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Morris, J. S.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2015-04-10
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 321-359
- ISSN
- 2326-8298 (ISSN-L)
- 2326-831X
- OpenAlex
- W3037531055
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 113
- FWCI
- 7.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional Regression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev-statistics-010814-020413
- The paper
- Morris, J. S. (2015). Functional Regression. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-010814-020413
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.