The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Web-Based Enrollment and Other Types of Self-Selection in Surveys and Studies: Consequences for Generalizability
Abstract
Web-based enrollment in surveys and studies is increasingly attractive as the Internet is approaching near-universal coverage and the attitude of respondents toward participation in classical modes of study deteriorates. Follow-up is also facilitated by the web-based approach. However, the consequent self-selection raises the question of the importance of representativity when attempting to generalize the results of a study beyond the context in which they were obtained, particularly under effect heterogeneity. Our review is divided into three main components: first, sample surveys or prevalence studies, assessing the frequency or prevalence of some attitude or disease condition in a population from its frequency in a sample from this population; second, generalization of the results from randomized trials to the population in which they were performed and to other populations; and third, generalization of results from observational studies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, due to convenience sampling, generalizing the results to a greater sample frame remains difficult, as the pooled effect sizes might be biased by self-selection86.”
From Prevalence and severity of mental health problems in early-career researchers: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [86]
Citations
Cites
Generalizing Study Results: A Potential Outcomes Perspective
Lesko, C. R., Buchanan, A. L., Westreich, D., Edwards, J. K., Hudgens, M. G., & Cole, S. R. (2017) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000000664 · Cited by 269
Representative Sampling, III: The Current Statistical Literature
Kruskal, W., & Mosteller, F. (1979) · International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique · doi:10.2307/1402647 · Cited by 194
Research works printed but not linked: 76
- 10.1093/aje/kwv007 · DOI
- 10.1093/pan/mps023 · DOI
- 10.1093/jssam/smt008 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1510507113 · DOI · Paper page
- Battaglia MP, 2008, Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods, 523
- 10.1093/biomet/ass063 · DOI
- 10.1093/jnci/djj374 · DOI
- Buchanan AL, 2015, Generalizing evidence from randomized trials using inverse probability of sampling weights
- 10.1093/poq/nfp075 · DOI
- 10.1080/01621459.2015.1123157 · DOI
- 10.1080/01621459.2016.1149407 · DOI
- 10.1093/aje/kwq084 · DOI
- 10.1086/318641 · DOI
- 10.1093/ije/dyw001 · DOI
- Elliott M, 2016, J. R. Stat. Soc. A, 179, 357
- 10.1080/02841860802032769 · DOI
- 10.1177/1740774509103868 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00021.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.03.013 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/sim.3218 · DOI
- 10.17226/24652 · DOI
- 10.1001/archpsyc.63.3.332 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000011 · DOI
- 10.1080/01621459.2016.1149401 · DOI
- 10.1093/aje/kwv008 · DOI
- 10.1093/aje/kwv006 · DOI
- 10.1111/rssa.12094 · DOI
- 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000400 · DOI
- 10.1136/jech.2004.029496 · DOI
- Hernán MA, 2017, Causal Inference
- 10.1080/01621459.1952.10483446 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00527.x · DOI
- Japec L, 2015, AAPOR report on big data
- Keeter S, 2014, Amstat News, 448, 3
- 10.1111/rssa.12136 · DOI
- Kennedy C, 2016, Evaluating Online Nonprobability Surveys
- Kiær AN, 1895, Bull. Int. Stat. Inst., 9, 176
- 10.2307/1403202 · DOI
- 10.2307/1402564 · DOI
- 10.2307/1403151 · DOI
- Leenheer J, 2013, Int. J. Internet Sci., 8, 17
- 10.1198/016214504000000467 · DOI
- Little RJ, 2012, J. Off. Stat., 28, 309
- 10.1214/16-STS584 · DOI
- 10.1093/biostatistics/kxn014 · DOI
- 10.1002/9781118763520.ch5 · DOI
- 10.2196/jmir.3161 · DOI
- 10.1201/b16720-50 · DOI
- Meng XL, 2016, J. R. Stat. Soc. A, 179, 351
- 10.1093/poq/nfw060 · DOI
- Miettinen OS, 1985, Theoretical Epidemiology
- 10.1093/ije/dyn191 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.i4262 · DOI
- Natl. Acad. Sci. Eng. Med., 2016, Reducing Response Burden in the American Community Survey: Proceedings of a Workshop
- 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00635.x · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511803161 · DOI · Paper page
- Pearl J, 2015, J. Causal Infer., 3, 259, 10.1515/jci-2015-0025 · DOI
- 10.1214/14-STS486 · DOI
- 10.1136/jech.2009.107185 · DOI
- 10.1136/jech-2011-200065 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.09.007 · DOI
- 10.1093/poq/nfp091 · DOI
- 10.1002/sim.3063 · DOI
- 10.1093/ije/dyt103 · DOI
- Rothman KJ, 1986, Modern Epidemiology
- 10.1093/ije/dys223 · DOI · Paper page
- Rothman KJ, 1998, Modern Epidemiology
- Rothman KJ, 2008, Modern Epidemiology
- Särndal CE, 2007, Surv. Methodol., 33, 99
- Särndal CE, Swensson B, Wretman J. 1992.Model Assisted Survey Sampling. New York: Springer · DOI
- Trewin D, 2014, Stat. J. IAOS, 30, 231, 10.3233/SJI-140829 · DOI
- Wagner J, 2012, J. Off. Stat., 28, 477
- 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2014.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1740774509102563 · DOI
- 10.1177/1740774510363753 · DOI
- 10.1093/poq/nfr020 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dreisoerner, A., Goetz, V., Frohnmayer, D., Tran, U. S., Voracek, M., & Nater, U. M. (2026) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02505-5 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Keiding, N., & Louis, T. A.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2018-03-07
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-47
- ISSN
- 2326-8298
- 2326-831X
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review