The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Issues in Divine Kingship
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Regicide in Buganda seems to have been replaced by civicide.
“As Gillian Feeley-Harnik (1985: 277) aptly put it, regicide, here, seems to have been replaced by civicide.”
From The divine kingship of the Shilluk (2011) · cites this paper as Feeley-Harnik (1985: 277)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The divine kingship of the Shilluk
Graeber, D. (2011) · HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory · doi:10.14318/2fhau.v1i1.7 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Feeley-Harnik, G.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Anthropology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1985-10
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 273-313
- ISSN
- 0084-6570 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4290
- OpenAlex
- W2177129120
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 47.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annual Review of Anthropology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Near East History
- Keywords
- divine kingship, kingship, religion and politics, political legitimacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
