The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Mexican-US Border: The Making of an Anthropology of Borderlands
Abstract
This review traces the development of an anthropology of borderlands. The ideas of early ethnography and applied anthropology about border regions are considered along with contemporary perspectives on reterritorialized communities and practices illustrated specifically by Mexican migration and transborder processes. The argument is made that the conceptual parameters of borderlands, borders, and their crossings, stemming from work done on the Mexican-US border, in particular, illustrate the contradiction, paradox, difference, and conflict of power and domination in contemporary global capitalism and the nation-state, especially as manifested in local-level practices. Furthermore, the borderlands genre is a basis upon which to redraw our conceptual frameworks of community and culture area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Migrant “Illegality” and Deportability in Everyday Life
De Genova, N. P. (2002) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085432 · Cited by 3,505
Salcido, O., & Adelman, M. (2004) · Human Organization · doi:10.17730/humo.63.2.v5w7812lpxextpbw · Cited by 120
Toward an Understanding of Borderland Processes
Parker, B. J. (2006) · American Antiquity · doi:10.2307/40035322 · Cited by 91
Steel Walls and Picket Fences: Rematerializing the U.S.-Mexican Border in Ambos Nogales
McGuire, R. H. (2013) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1111/aman.12029 · Cited by 61
Liu, M., Hu, X., & Schedl, M. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208186 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Alvarez, R. R.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Anthropology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 447-470
- ISSN
- 0084-6570 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4290
- OpenAlex
- W2174494694
- Cited by
- 479
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
