CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,083Anthropological Studies and InsightsInternational Relations and Foreign PolicyGlobalization and political ideologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Doing good?: The politics and antipolitics of NGO practices

Fisher, William F.·1997·Annual Review of Anthropology
DOI 10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.439
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This review surveys current literature concerned with the growing numbers, changing functions, and intensifying networks of nongovernmental organizations which have had significant impacts upon globalization, international and national politics, and local lives. Studies of these changes illuminate understandings of translocal flows of ideas, knowledge, funding, and people; shed light on changing relationships among citizenry, associations, and the state; and encourage a reconsideration of connections between the personal and the political. Attention is given to the political implications of discourses about NGOs, the complex micropolitics of these associations, and the importance of situating them as evolving processes within complexes of competing and overlapping practices and discourses.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.439

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. Ahuja K, 1994, Stud. Third World Soc., 51, 1
  2. Appadurai A. 1991. Global ethnoscapes: notes and queries for a transnational anthropology. In Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present , ed. R Fox, pp. 191–210. Santa Fe: Sch. Am. Res.
  3. Aufderheide P, 1988, World Policy J., 5, 300
  4. Banuri T. 1993. The landscape of diplomatic conflicts. In Global Ecology: A New Arena of Global Conflict , ed. W Sachs, pp. 49–67. London: Zed
  5. Bebbington AJ. 1996. Movements, modernizations, and markets. In Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements , ed. R Peet, M Watts, pp. 86–109. London: Routledge
  6. Bebbington AJ, 1993, NGOs and the State in Latin America: Rethinking Roles in Sustainable Agricultural Development.
  7. Biggs SD, Neame AD. 1996. Negotiating room to maneuver: reflections concerning NGO autonomy and accountability with the new policy agenda. SeeEdwards & Hulme 1996a, pp. 40–52
  8. Brown LD, 1989, The role of voluntary organizations in development.
  9. Cernea M, 1988, Discuss. Pap. No. 40.
  10. Chambers R, 1995, Inst. Dev. Stud. Work. Pap. 14.
  11. Chazan N, 1992, World Policy J., 9, 279
  12. Ching F, 1994, Far East. Econ. Rev.
  13. Clarke G, 1993, Philipp. Q. Cult. Soc., 21, 231
  14. Clarke G, 1996, Pap. Int. Dev. No. 20.
  15. Dichter T, 1991, Transnatl. Assoc., 2, 66
  16. Edwards M, Hulme D. 1996b. Beyond the magic bullet? Lessons and conclusions. SeeEdwards & Hulme 1996a, pp. 254–66
  17. Farrington J, 1993, Non-Governmental Organisations and the State in Asia: Rethinking Roles in Sustainable Agricultural Development.
  18. Finger M. 1994b. Environmental NGOs in the UNCED process. SeePrincen & Finger 1994, pp. 186–213
  19. Fisher WF. 1995b. Development and resistance in the Narmada Valley. SeeFisher 1995a, pp. 3–46
  20. Fisher WF. 1995c. Full of sound and fury? Struggling toward sustainable development in India's Narmada Valley. SeeFisher 1995a, pp. 445–61
  21. 1994, FAO Collaboration with Asian NGOs for Participatory Rural Development: The Case of ANGOC.
  22. Foucault M, 1980, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings,
  23. Foucault M. 1986. Space, knowledge, power. In The Foucault Reader , ed P Rabinow, pp. 239–56. New York: Penguin
  24. Foucault M. 1991. Governmentality. SeeBurchell et al 1991, pp. 87–104
  25. Fowler A, 1988, IDS Discuss. Pap. 249.
  26. Fowler A, 1995, Occas. Pap. Ser. 1(2).
  27. Frank AG, Fuentes M. 1990. Civil democracy: social movements in recent world history. In Transforming the Revolution: Social Movements and the World System , ed. S Amin, G Arrighi, A Gunder-Frank, I Wallerstein, pp. 139–80. New York: Monthly Review
  28. Gariyo Z. 1996. NGOs and development in East Africa. SeeEdwards & Hulme 1996a, pp. 156–65
  29. Ghils P, 1992, Int. Soc. Sci. J., 44, 417
  30. Gordon C. 1991. Governmental rationality: an introduction. SeeBurchell et al 1991, pp. 1–53
  31. Hashemi S, 1992, State and NGO Support Networks in Rural Bangladesh: Concepts and Coalitions for Control.
  32. Hogg R, 1992, Nomadic Peoples, 30, 122
  33. Hulme D. 1994. Social development research and the third sector: NGOs as users and subjects of social enquiry. In Rethinking Social Development: Theory, Research and Practice , ed. D Booth, pp. 251–75. Harlow: Longman
  34. Hyden G. 1998. State and nation under stress. In Recovery in Africa: A Challenge for Development Cooperation in the 90s , pp. 145–57. Stockholm: Swed. Minist. Foreign Aff. In press
  35. Jhamtani H, 1992, Earth Island J., 7, 10
  36. Karat P, 1988, Foreign Funding and the Philosophy of Voluntary Organisations: A Factor in Imperialist Strategy.
  37. Kauffman LA, 1990, Social. Rev., 20, 67
  38. Kothari R, 1986, Econ. Polit. Weekly, 21, 2177
  39. Landim L. 1993. Brazilian crossroads: people's groups, walls and bridges. SeeWignaraja 1993a, pp. 218–29
  40. Leatherman J, 1994, Work. Pap. Ser. Joan B. Kroc Inst. Int. Peace Stud.,
  41. Lind AC. 1992. Power, gender and development: popular women's organisations and the politics of needs in Ecuador. In The Making of Social Movements in Latin America: Identity, Strategy, and Democracy , ed. A Escobar, S Alvarez, pp. 139–49. Boulder: Westview
  42. Lopez GA, 1995, Bull. Atomic Sci., 33
  43. Marulasiddaiah HM, 1994, Stud. Third World Soc., 51, 49
  44. Mehta AS, 1996, Cult. Surv., 20, 26
  45. Michels R, 1959, Political Parties.
  46. Millett K, 1971, Sexual Politics.
  47. Ndegwa SN, 1993, Work. Pap. No. 491.
  48. Patel A. 1995. What do the Narmada Valley tribals want? SeeFisher 1995, pp. 179–200
  49. Patkar M. 1995. The struggle for participation and justice: a historical narrative. SeeFisher 1995, pp. 157–78
  50. Peters P, 1996, Cult. Surviv. Q., 20, 22
  51. Pratt B, 1995, Multilateral agencies and NGOs: a position paper.
  52. Rademacher A, 1993, Democracy, Development and NGOs.
  53. Rahnema M. 1992. Participation. In The Development Dictionary , ed. W Sachs, pp. 116–31. London: Zed
  54. Ribot J, 1996, Cult. Surviv., 20, 40
  55. Robinson M. 1993. Governance, democracy and conditionality: NGOs and the new policy agenda. In Governance, Democracy And Conditionality: What Role for NGOs ? ed. A Clayton, pp. Oxford: Int. NGO Train. Res. Cent.
  56. Salamon LM, 1993, The global associational revolution: the rise of third sector on the world scene.
  57. Sanyal B, 1994, Cooperative autonomy: the dialectics of state-NGO relationships in developing countries.
  58. Sethi H. 1993a. Survival and democracy: ecological struggles in India. SeeWignaraja 1993a, pp. 122–48
  59. Sethi H. 1993b. Action groups in the new politics. SeeWignaraja 1993a, pp. 230–55
  60. Silliman GS. 1994. Human rights and he transition to democracy. In Patterns of Power and Politics in the Philippines: Implications for Development , ed. J Eder, R Youngblood, pp. 103–46. Tempe: Ariz. State Univ.
  61. Tandon R. 1994. Civil society, the state and the role of NGOs. In Civil Society in the Asia-Pacific Region , ed. I Serrano, pp. 117–36. Washington, DC: CIVICUS
  62. Thomson A, 1992, The World Bank and Cooperation with NGOs.
  63. Udall L. 1995. The international Narmada campaign: a case of sustained advocacy. SeeFisher 1995a, pp. 210–27
  64. 1993, Human Development Report 1993.
  65. Vettivel SK, 1993, Participation and Sustainable Development: Theory and Practice in Government and NGOs.
  66. Wacker C. 1994. Sustainable development through women's groups: a cultural approach to sustainable development. In Feminist Perspectives on Sustainable Development , ed. W Harcourt, pp. 128–42. London: Zed
  67. Wapner P, 1994, Dissent, 41, 389
  68. Wellard K, 1993, Nongovernmental Organisations and the State in Africa: Rethinking Roles in Sustainable Agriculture.
  69. Wignaraja P. 1993b. Rethinking development and democracy. SeeWignaraja 1993a, pp. 4–35
  70. 1991, World Development Report 1991: The Challenge of Development.
  71. Zadek S, Gatward M. 1996. Transforming the transnational NGOs: Social auditing or bust? SeeEdwards & Hulme 1996a, pp. 226–40

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,083

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Fisher, W. F.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Fisher, William F.
ORCID
Fisher, William F.
Venue
Annual Review of Anthropology
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
1997-10
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
439-464
ISSN
  • 0084-6570 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4290
DOI
10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.439
OpenAlex
W2100619499
Cited by
1,083
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 70
FWCI
25.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Anthropology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
Keywords
non-governmental organizations, anti-politics, globalization, citizen associations, state-citizen relations, personal and political, micropolitics, NGO discourse, civil society

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review