The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mirrors and Windows: Sociocultural Studies of Human-Animal Relationships
Abstract
▪ Abstract Humans' relationships with animals, increasingly the subject of controversy, have long been of interest to those whose primary aim has been the better understanding of humans' relationships with other humans. Since this topic was last reviewed here, human-animal relationships have undergone considerable reexamination, reflecting key trends in the history of social analysis, including concerns with connections between anthropology and colonialism and with the construction of race, class, and gender identities. There have been many attempts to integrate structuralist or symbolic approaches with those focused on environmental, political, and economic dimensions. Human-animal relationships are now much more likely to be considered in dynamic terms, and consequently, there has been much interdisciplinary exchange between anthropologists and historians. Some research directly engages moral and political concerns about animals, but it is likely that sociocultural research on human-animal relationships will continue to be as much, if not more, about humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences.
Moore, F. C. T., & Foucault, M. (1971) · Man · doi:10.2307/2799252 · Cited by 8,100
Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society
McKeon, M., & Williams, R. (1977) · Studies in Romanticism · doi:10.2307/25600068 · Cited by 6,815
Europe and the People without History
Gran, P., & Wolf, E. R. (1984) · The History Teacher · doi:10.2307/493157 · Cited by 3,799
Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-6234 · Cited by 3,677
The anti-politics machine: "development," depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-2279 · Cited by 3,594
Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science.
Rossiter, M. W., & Haraway, D. (1990) · The Journal of American History · doi:10.2307/2079298 · Cited by 2,242
(1993) · Cited by 1,573
Deep play: notes on the Balinese cockfight
Geertz, C. (2005) · Daedalus · doi:10.1162/001152605774431563 · Cited by 1,123
Colonialism's Culture: Anthropology, Travel and Government.
Adas, M., & Thomas, N. (1996) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/2170404 · Cited by 809
The Fall of Natural Man: The American Indian and the Origins of Comparative Ethnology
Liss, P. K., & Pagden, A. (1983) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1874227 · Cited by 756
Cited by
How dogs dream: Amazonian natures and the politics of transspecies engagement
KOHN, E. (2007) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1525/ae.2007.34.1.3 · Cited by 722
Ethnoprimatology and the Anthropology of the Human-Primate Interface
Fuentes, A. (2012) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145808 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Mullin, M. H.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Anthropology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 201-224
- ISSN
- 0084-6570 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4290
- OpenAlex
- W2116895245
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 88
- FWCI
- 18.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mirrors and Windows: Sociocultural Studies of Human-Animal Relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.201
- The paper
- Mullin, M. H. (1999). Mirrors and Windows: Sociocultural Studies of Human-Animal Relationships. Annual Review of Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.