Cited by 249Photosynthetic Processes and MechanismsPlant biochemistry and biosynthesisPlant nutrient uptake and metabolism

M OLECULAR E NGINEERING OF C4 P HOTOSYNTHESIS

Matsuoka, Makoto, Furbank, Robert T, Fukayama, Hiroshi, Miyao, Mitsue·2001·Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology

Abstract

The majority of terrestrial plants, including many important crops such as rice, wheat, soybean, and potato, are classified as C3 plants that assimilate atmospheric CO2 directly through the C3 photosynthetic pathway. C4 plants such as maize and sugarcane evolved from C3 plants, acquiring the C4 photosynthetic pathway to achieve high photosynthetic performance and high water- and nitrogen-use efficiencies. The recent application of recombinant DNA technology has made considerable progress in the molecular engineering of C4 photosynthesis over the past several years. It has deepened our understanding of the mechanism of C4 photosynthesis and provided valuable information as to the evolution of the C4 photosynthetic genes. It also has enabled us to express enzymes involved in the C4 pathway at high levels and in desired locations in the leaves of C3 plants for engineering of primary carbon metabolism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.297

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Success in enhancing photosynthetic capacity by transferring PEPC is not significant when the gene is transferred to a phylogenetically distant plant species.

    “Although Matsuoka et al. (2001) have reported that a number of C 3 plants over-expressing C 4 PEPC have shown enhanced photosynthetic capacity, the success is not so significant, when the PEPC gene is transferred to a phylogenetically distant plant species.”

    From Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview (2013) · cites this paper as Matsuoka et al. 2001

  • A number of C3 plants over-expressing C4 PEPC have shown enhanced photosynthetic capacity.

    “Although Matsuoka et al. (2001) have reported that a number of C 3 plants over-expressing C 4 PEPC have shown enhanced photosynthetic capacity, the success is not so significant, when the PEPC gene is transferred to a phylogenetically distant plant species.”

    From Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview (2013) · cites this paper as Matsuoka et al. 2001

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matsuoka, M., Furbank, R. T., Fukayama, H., & Miyao, M.
Affiliations
  • Nagoya University (JP)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Institute of Agrobiological Sciences (JP)
Venue
Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology
Published
2001-06
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
297-314
ISSN
1040-2519 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113975313
Cited by
249
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Keywords
C4 photosynthesis, molecular engineering, C3 plants, recombinant DNA technology, primary carbon metabolism, water use efficiency, nitrogen use efficiency, maize, sugarcane

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review